Closed MurzNN closed 3 years ago
When analyzing sources, I figured-out other way to define ports, that works well:
port_bindings:
- '88:80'
Should I update the pillar.example
to add this example, or it is wrong?
Hey Aexey, Yes, please do that update. regards Noel
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 12:24 PM Alexey Murz Korepov < @.***> wrote:
When analyzing sources, I figured-out other way to define ports, that works well:
port_bindings: - '88:80'
Should I update the pillar.example to add this example, or it is wrong?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/saltstack-formulas/docker-formula/issues/279#issuecomment-817729567, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADFUUQRNNPIHILX5WO5DLDLTILJ6XANCNFSM42ZCAICA .
Resolved via #280
I'm trying to set ports mapping for the contaner, using this pillar structure:
The format of
ports
line I get from pillar.example file.But when applying this config, I got the error:
Where can be the problem? Maybe the pillar.example file is outdated, and we need to use other format for ports settings?