Open davidkarlsen opened 10 years ago
Quick fix here: https://github.com/saltstack-formulas/gitlab-formula/pull/4
@davidkarlsen this should be fixed now, please verify.
Doesn´t work for me:
EBUG ] Rendered data from file: /var/cache/salt/minion/files/base/gitlab/nginx.sls:
nginx:
pkg:
- installed
service:
- running
- enable: True
- require:
- pkg: nginx
- user: nginx
- watch:
- file: gitlab-nginx
file.absent:
- name: /etc/nginx/sites-enabled/default.conf
user.present:
- name: www-data
- groups:
- git
- require:
- pkg: nginx
# https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/lib/support/nginx/gitlab
gitlab-nginx:
file.managed:
- name: /etc/nginx/sites-enabled/gitlab.conf
- source: salt://gitlab/files/gitlab-nginx
- template: jinja
- user: root
- group: root
- mode: 644
- require:
- pkg: nginx
[DEBUG ] Results of YAML rendering:
OrderedDict([('nginx', OrderedDict([('pkg', ['installed']), ('service', ['running', OrderedDict([('enable', True)]), OrderedDict([('require', [OrderedDict([('pkg', 'nginx')]), OrderedDict([('user', 'nginx')])])]), OrderedDict([('watch', [OrderedDict([('file', 'gitlab-nginx')])])])]), ('file.absent', [OrderedDict([('name', '/etc/nginx/sites-enabled/default.conf')])]), ('user.present', [OrderedDict([('name', 'www-data')]), OrderedDict([('groups', ['git'])]), OrderedDict([('require', [OrderedDict([('pkg', 'nginx')])])])])])), ('gitlab-nginx', OrderedDict([('file.managed', [OrderedDict([('name', '/etc/nginx/sites-enabled/gitlab.conf')]), OrderedDict([('source', 'salt://gitlab/files/gitlab-nginx')]), OrderedDict([('template', 'jinja')]), OrderedDict([('user', 'root')]), OrderedDict([('group', 'root')]), OrderedDict([('mode', 644)]), OrderedDict([('require', [OrderedDict([('pkg', 'nginx')])])])])]))])
[DEBUG ] Loaded no_out as virtual quiet
[DEBUG ] Loaded json_out as virtual json
[DEBUG ] Loaded yaml_out as virtual yaml
[DEBUG ] Loaded pprint_out as virtual pprint
local:
Data failed to compile:
----------
No matching sls found for 'gitlab' in env 'base'
----------
No matching sls found for 'gitlab' in env 'base'
root@main:/srv/pillar#
Could you wrap it in a code block? This formatting makes it hard to read.
@viq OK, done
ping?
Just out of interest sake. If gitlab is to depend on the git formula, the git formula will need some changes for gitlab to work on CentOS ect. in the future.
For example the inclusion of the PUIAS_6_computational repository, is specifically to get a new enough version of GIT that is compatible with Gitlab. If Gitlab requires on another Git formula, this repository needs to be included in said formula.
Hm. Gitlab does require Git 1.8 or newer. CentOS 6 is currently on 1.7.1. This version incompatibility was present before #4 was merged and should be a new issue.
@Tinuva how have you configured CentOS to run GitLab? Mind filing a new issue with details?
I was told it should actually work with what's available on CentOS, but I have not presonally verified yet - especially as I haven't yet managed on CentOS to make gitlab pick up a ruby new enough to work.
@whiteinge I am still busy working out all the broken states that I have to get there. Will do once I have everything working.
@Tinuva how are you getting a ruby new enough to run gitlab on CentOS?
@davidkarlsen uhm, sorry. No, I don't really know why that's happening for you. What's your directory structure, where's your gitlab formula/state located?
I use gitfs:
gitfs_remotes:
....
- git@github.com:davidkarlsen/git-formula.git
- git@github.com:davidkarlsen/gitlab-formula.git
....
and have this in my state map:
'roles:gitlab':
- match: grain
- gitlab
and my grains:
root@main:/srv/salt# cat /etc/salt/grains
roles:
- dnsserver
- javabuild
- smtpserver
- saltmaster
- gitlab
@davidkarlsen it seems that one of the things gitlab formula references is not there - see #13236
I am working on refreshing the gitlab formula somewhat, and making sure the stuff it uses is either self-contained or explicitly mentioned, but it's currently work in progress.
@viq Which #13236 ?
@davidkarlsen sorry, https://github.com/saltstack/salt/issues/13236
@viq,
I finally got Gitlab to build and install via this saltstack formula from a clean CentOS 6 install.
Ruby and Git is now pulled from the following repository: http://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/repositories/home:/takehironet/CentOS_CentOS-6/home:takehironet.repo
I removed the CentOS-SCL repo, as well as the Puias computation repo after enabling Takehironet's repository.
That said, my tree is now a bit of a mess and need some cleaning up, but if you want I can still upload it so that you can have a look. It will need some more fine tuning to distinguish between CentOS 6 and 7 which will be released soon. It also needs to make use of more jinja maps, actually it need a lot of jinja love.
@Tinuva thanks, I'll investigate that repo. Yeah, I would like to see your changes.
@viq added it on here: https://github.com/Tinuva/gitlab-formula
@Tinuva awesome, thank you.
I am working on refreshing the gitlab formula somewhat, and making sure the stuff it uses is either self-contained or explicitly mentioned, but it's currently work in progress.
@viq I refactored the formula and uploaded it to https://github.com/bechtoldt/gitlab-formula . Feel free to share your ideas.
Have a look at a significant work @xmj did at https://github.com/viq/gitlab-formula-1/pull/1 for making this work better on RedHat/CentOS.
I'll try to look and comment, but I will apologise in advance as I am notoriously bad at doing things in any kind of timely manner :(
viq
@viq no worries, we share the same problem. :)
I'm working on a FreeBSD port of GitLab at the moment, and will then extend and amalgamate the GitLab formulas mentioned above to run it there too. :)
Please see this discussion: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/salt-users/Mlr7oITFqZw basically the guitlab formula conflicts with the git formula and should rather include/depend on it.