Closed morsik closed 8 years ago
Could you please test it? This is a large modification.
Fixed one thing, looks like it works now.
You might as well replace iteritems with items while you are in there...
Is |dictsort
filter ok? ;)
Should be better than .items()
/.iteritems()
, see #16.
@morsik We now have a conflict of your usage of dictsort and the recently merged https://github.com/saltstack-formulas/haproxy-formula/pull/37 that @abednarik wrote. @abednarik do you have any concerns over using dictsort here? I don't have any, but I also don't use haproxy at all so I'm not sure if the sorting would be problematic for some users.
Ok. Also I don't have any complain regarding dictsort as long as formula works good I'm just fine. We can drop this PR.
@abednarik Yours was already merged, @morsik needs to rebase, no worries!
Oh god…
@morsik What's wrong? Rebase should detect his updates versus your changes and there should be no issue, just use a merge strategy of yours instead of his.
I hate those conflicts... check now, and don't make conflicts when it's not needed next time, please? This rebase took me more time than changing that code btw at the first time…
@morsik I also don't like the conflicts but it happens, none of us are paid to work on this stuff as we're all volunteers, sometimes mistakes happen. Thanks for fixing it up.
Sorry for any inconvenience and thanks both.
Cheers El nov. 24, 2015 5:55 PM, "Forrest" notifications@github.com escribió:
Merged #34 https://github.com/saltstack-formulas/haproxy-formula/pull/34 .
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/saltstack-formulas/haproxy-formula/pull/34#event-473781515 .
Thanks, unfortunaletly GitHub doesn't have option to do Rebase so I had to it manually (and learn how to do it :P)
You had fantasy for using list in
.iteritems()
… :DNot tested. Changed "on fly" when I looked into template file.