test(versions): bump salt pkg versions for travis

noelmcloughlin commented 4 years ago

PR progress checklist (to be filled in by reviewers)

[x] Changes to documentation are appropriate (or tick if not required)
[x] Changes to tests are appropriate (or tick if not required)
[ ] Reviews completed

What type of PR is this?

Primary type

[ ] [build] Changes related to the build system
[ ] [chore] Changes to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries such as documentation generation
[x] [ci] Changes to the continuous integration configuration
[ ] [feat] A new feature
[ ] [fix] A bug fix
[ ] [perf] A code change that improves performance
[ ] [refactor] A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
[ ] [revert] A change used to revert a previous commit
[ ] [style] Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc.)

Secondary type

[ ] [docs] Documentation changes
[x] [test] Adding missing or correcting existing tests

Does this PR introduce a `BREAKING CHANGE`?

No.

Related issues and/or pull requests

Describe the changes you're proposing

Bump salt package versions for Travis

Pillar / config required to test the proposed changes

Debug log showing how the proposed changes work

Documentation checklist

[x] Updated the README (e.g. Available states).
[x] Updated pillar.example.

Testing checklist

[x] Included in Kitchen (i.e. under state_top).
[x] Covered by new/existing tests (e.g. InSpec, Serverspec, etc.).
[x] Updated the relevant test pillar.

Additional context

myii commented 4 years ago

Thanks for this @noelmcloughlin. I'm just running a test across all of the instances to ensure the changes are working properly:

https://travis-ci.org/myii/salt-formula/builds/641153872

noelmcloughlin commented 4 years ago

Thanks @myii for doing that. I reviewed and added a commit to fix Centos. I must look at Arch but I think thats unrelated issue.

myii commented 4 years ago

@noelmcloughlin Don't worry about Arch, it's not supported by this formula. I've got a couple of suggestions that I'll be adding as a review shortly.

noelmcloughlin commented 4 years ago

it's not supported by this formula

Arch is supported (well it can work). I've been using this on Arch successfully in 2019

noelmcloughlin commented 4 years ago

've got a couple of suggestions that I'll be adding as a review shortly.

Not too many. I've been working on this formula all day (to clear the way) so done my bit ;-)

myii commented 4 years ago

@noelmcloughlin Do you mind squashing the commits into the single original commit, for semantic-release purposes, i.e.

test(versions): bump salt pkg versions

Otherwise, I can Squash and merge using GitHub instead.

myii commented 4 years ago

test/integration/v201902-py3/controls/pkgs_spec.rb:
     when 'centos'
-      '2019.2.2-1.el8'
+      '2019.2.3-1.el8'

@noelmcloughlin I've added the above in another commit and I'll merge this once Travis is done.

saltstack-formulas-travis commented 4 years ago

:tada: This PR is included in version 1.1.1 :tada:

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot :package::rocket:

saltstack-formulas / salt-formula