Closed doubletwist13 closed 3 years ago
Thanks for the report, @doubletwist13. At least all of these llines are going to have to be adjusted:
@doubletwist13 Would you mind testing the fix proposed in #41? If you get a chance, please post your feedback there.
Your setup
Formula commit hash / release tag
commit 1a0a422981ee5087c3a3565b32171accf4163899
Versions reports (master & minion)
Salt Version: Salt: 3002.5
Dependency Versions: cffi: Not Installed cherrypy: unknown dateutil: Not Installed docker-py: Not Installed gitdb: 0.6.4 gitpython: 1.0.1 Jinja2: 2.11.1 libgit2: Not Installed M2Crypto: 0.35.2 Mako: Not Installed msgpack: 0.6.2 msgpack-pure: Not Installed mysql-python: Not Installed pycparser: Not Installed pycrypto: Not Installed pycryptodome: Not Installed pygit2: Not Installed Python: 3.6.8 (default, Nov 11 2020, 09:19:43) python-gnupg: Not Installed PyYAML: 5.1.2 PyZMQ: 17.0.0 smmap: 0.9.0 timelib: Not Installed Tornado: 4.5.3 ZMQ: 4.1.4
System Versions: dist: ol 7.9 locale: UTF-8 machine: x86_64 release: 5.4.17-2036.103.3.1.el7uek.x86_64 system: Linux version: Oracle Linux Server 7.9
Pillar / config used
Bug details
Formula fails with jinja errors about unsafe objects in v3002.5 - likely due to fix for CVE-2021-25283 Issue appears to be in macro.jinja
Steps to reproduce the bug
salt * state.apply snmp.conf
Expected behaviour
Expect states to apply without error
Attempts to fix the bug
N/A
Additional context
N/A