refactor(formula): fix formula

[codeboyQ2n5ha45]

PR progress checklist (to be filled in by reviewers)

• [ ] Changes to documentation are appropriate (or tick if not required)
• [ ] Changes to tests are appropriate (or tick if not required)
• [ ] Reviews completed

---

What type of PR is this?

Primary type

• [ ] [build] Changes related to the build system
• [ ] [chore] Changes to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries such as documentation generation
• [ ] [ci] Changes to the continuous integration configuration
• [x] [feat] A new feature
• [x] [fix] A bug fix
• [ ] [perf] A code change that improves performance
• [x] [refactor] A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
• [ ] [revert] A change used to revert a previous commit
• [ ] [style] Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc.)

Secondary type

• [ ] [docs] Documentation changes
• [x] [test] Adding missing or correcting existing tests

Does this PR introduce a BREAKING CHANGE?

No.

Related issues and/or pull requests

Describe the changes you're proposing

Pillar / config required to test the proposed changes

Debug log showing how the proposed changes work

Documentation checklist

• [ ] Updated the README (e.g. Available states).
• [x] Updated pillar.example.

Testing checklist

• [ ] Included in Kitchen (i.e. under state_top).
• [ ] Covered by new/existing tests (e.g. InSpec, Serverspec, etc.).
• [ ] Updated the relevant test pillar.

Additional context

[codeboyQ2n5ha45]

@noelmcloughlin . I created a new pull request. I tested in TravisCI for both CentOS and Ubuntu and the service starts properly. I also added options for local user configuration, and certs from the old formula in case someone needs to use those.

[noelmcloughlin]

Thanks @codeboyQ2n5ha45 Closes #1 #2 #3# #4 and replaces #7 where PR merge was discussed.