style: quote numbers and file modes

[jasonious]

salt linters complain about these.

PR progress checklist (to be filled in by reviewers)

• [ ] Changes to documentation are appropriate (or tick if not required)
• [ ] Changes to tests are appropriate (or tick if not required)
• [ ] Reviews completed

---

What type of PR is this?

Primary type

• [ ] [build] Changes related to the build system
• [ ] [chore] Changes to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries such as documentation generation
• [ ] [ci] Changes to the continuous integration configuration
• [ ] [feat] A new feature
• [ ] [fix] A bug fix
• [ ] [perf] A code change that improves performance
• [ ] [refactor] A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
• [ ] [revert] A change used to revert a previous commit
• [ ] [style] Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc.)

Secondary type

• [ ] [docs] Documentation changes
• [ ] [test] Adding missing or correcting existing tests

Does this PR introduce a BREAKING CHANGE?

No.

Related issues and/or pull requests

Describe the changes you're proposing

Changed raw file modes to the more preferred style of quoted with a leading zero

Pillar / config required to test the proposed changes

Debug log showing how the proposed changes work

Documentation checklist

• [ ] Updated the README (e.g. Available states).
• [ ] Updated pillar.example.

Testing checklist

• [ ] Included in Kitchen (i.e. under state_top).
• [ ] Covered by new/existing tests (e.g. InSpec, Serverspec, etc.).
• [ ] Updated the relevant test pillar.

Additional context

[myii]

@jasonious Thanks for this PR. Technically, there isn't a problem here. The full discussion is captured here:

• https://github.com/warpnet/salt-lint/issues/29
  • Essentially, the only problem that must be avoided are unquoted numbers beginning with zero.

After the improvements made to salt-lint after that report, we've set this across a large number of formulas in this org:

https://github.com/saltstack-formulas/users-formula/blob/b5aac7797cf8df7a086d001d271e07179c40a9ff/.salt-lint#L9-L12

And we have salt-lint running in Travis for each of these formulas.

---

None of this prevents this PR being merged, or the one in the postfix-formula. However, there's not much benefit to doing this in other formulas, so hopefully this can save you some time and effort!

[myii]

Merged, thanks @jasonious!

[saltstack-formulas-travis]

:tada: This PR is included in version 0.48.6 :tada:

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot :package::rocket:

[jasonious]

Thanks for the discussion links. I am running just the generic linter and went from there without too much investigation. I'll leave the rest be, but nice to know I can pull in the latest for these two and they'll "just work" in our states now. cheers.