Closed hereisderek closed 1 year ago
What's the benefit of using this over ddclient?
What's the benefit of using this over ddclient?
it's got a pretty neat web UI, different set of supported service provider (this has 32 vs ddclient 28, based on their document.)
personally, i find ddns-updater is easier to work with ipv6 than ddclient, maybe i didn't do it right, i couldn't get both both ipv4 and ipv6 working on ddclient for the past one or two hours i was trying to set it up.
CI build is failing.
Please also add healthcheck part (see recent PR)
The CI confirms what the checkboxes tell us–that you haven't tested this to a meaningful extent.
There's a way to deal with the app name having a dash without replacing it with underscore everywhere or hardcoding the subdomain name. Refer to calibre-web to see how it's done.
I'm going to close this as it
a) Hasn't been tested
b) Duplicates functionality we already have with ddclient
c) Was created to solve a problem that we've addressed on Discord
In the future, please test roles before submitting them. The goal of Sandbox is not to be a collection of every possible app available.
Description
Lightweight universal DDNS Updater with Docker and web UI, that updates DNS A and/or AAAA records periodically for multiple DNS providers
https://github.com/qdm12/ddns-updater/ https://hub.docker.com/r/qmcgaw/ddns-updater/
How Has This Been Tested?
Ran locally