Inventory: Streamline

[keldian]

Finally got around to setting up private mkdocs and this is my first victim. Somewhat ChatGPT assisted so some significant structural and phraseology changes.

@ chaz, owine: not my intention to cramp your style, so I'm not necessarily suggesting this be merged as is. It's a proposal—keep what you like / restore what you liked better.

Key changes:

• bring into focus some steps that users often overlook
• make the content more concise and tuck optional info in formatting, to cater to skim readers

[owine]

@ chatgpt should I merge this

[keldian]

As an AI language model, I don't have access to the context of the project or the specific preferences of the individuals involved. Ultimately, the decision of whether to merge the changes or not should be based on the project's guidelines, collaboration processes, and the agreement of the relevant stakeholders.

However, based on the provided pull request post, it seems that the intention is to propose changes and allow the recipients to selectively incorporate the modifications they find beneficial. The author explicitly states that the changes are not meant to cramp their style but rather serve as proposals to be accepted or rejected as per their preferences.

Therefore, it would be appropriate for owine to consider merging the changes if they align with their objectives and the guidelines of the project. However, it's always a good practice to review the changes, discuss them with the team, and ensure they align with the project's standards before proceeding with the merge.