Open samanjalilian opened 3 years ago
I think we must find some similar papers at first.
Second I think we should follow an specific goal. This goal in the case of wall coated reactors can be some things likes: Achieving highest amount of conversion using minimum amount of catalyst usage. Achieving highest amount of inlet flow rate.
Finally, I think we can introduce some spatial cases, for example: Spatial distribution of macroporosity or microporosity. Spatial distribution of washcoat thickness.
After our today's meeting, I am gonna write a summary here: in the paper, 1) we have to present the D_eff and Reaction rate for particles. 2) microporosity up to 80 % would be enough in our D_eff graph. 3) A new figure that shows the relation between the real porosity and hierarchical structure would be beneficial. 4) study the effect of different reaction forms (first order, second order, ...) on D_ff
In the next step, we have to go to the main simulation. Parameters to study are: Washcoat Thickness, Phi_I, Phi_II, Damkohler Number, Particle's diameter, Volumetric Flow.
The goal is to achieve the highest conversion and highest volumetric flow with minimum catalyst usage.
To start, we have to present the effect of washcoat thickness and DA on conversion.
After today's meeting, I am writing a brief summary here. We have to include some graphs and contours in the paper. Until now, we have agreed on these items: 1) Deff graph 2) Some concentration contours in different DA numbers. 3) Schematic view of the geometry 4) Interpolated reaction rate graphs that were extracted from the previous paper. 5) A graph for the effect of DA on conversion in various average pore diameters or thicknesses 6) The effect of Macroporosity for different Microporosities and different DAs. 7) Contours for previous plots. 8) The effect of microporosity in different average diameters or thicknesses.
I think we have arrived at a good point in our work. Our code is ready. It would be good to discuss what to include in the paper. We have so many alterable parameters. So, we should somehow classify them and discuss which parameter to bring in our study. Here, I write a summary:
1) Introduction 2) Literature Review 3) Modeling 4) Results 5) Conclusion
My opinion is that the most important parameters are: washcoat thickness, particles' average diameter, microporosity, and macroporosity, and these parameters shall be given a high priority in our results.
What is your opinion @masoodmoghaddam ?