Closed micwoj92 closed 1 year ago
Thanks for re-raising the issue. My earlier attempt at getting it working was a wash due to the way the tests were done for the package, which is why it was just packaged using the release wheel.
However, I have spent several hours on it since yesterday (luckily, I am on vacation) and had some time to focus on this. There have been several changes that helped fix most of the issues I had upstream as well. So been making good headway on a new and robust build setup. I should have a new release for the pyinstaller
suite of packages with tests in a couple of hours.
Please test it out on riscv64
, and let me know the feedback once I push it out (I'll update the ticket when I push it out).
I have finished working on this (and both the release and git versions are now stable and out). Let me know how it works out.
Works, thanks.
I've raised my concerns previously in https://github.com/samarthj/AUR/issues/1#issuecomment-962539892 Now I have riscv64 board I have troubles with your package (pyinstaller in this case). Also python packaging guidelines have changed since I wrote last issue and now mainly recommend using pep517.