Open pfaelzerchen opened 11 months ago
To help identify the issue: can you please take a look at the generated configmap that the operator creates and see if the change is reflected in the generated JSON file there that the operator provides to the samba containers?
The changes are immediately reflected in the config map. Switching to readOnly true, kubectl apply and kubectl get cm shows "read only": "yes" in the config map. This is also completely reproducible (switching back and forth).
That implies that the problem is on the samba container side. Either an issue in the interaction between the configmap and the container or a bug in sambacc. Thanks for the info - I'll try and look into it more in-depth soon.
I recognized that the samba-operator seems to automatically resolve changes to SmbShare definitions. I applied to following definition with kubectl apply:
After I got access, I changed spec.readOnly to false (obviously readOnly for backups was a typo). After kubectl apply the resource to the cluster, nothing happened. I had to manually delete the pod for that share. After that, the operator successfully recreated the pod with the new settings.
This behaviour is reproducible. I had expected that the changes would be applied automatically.