Closed anoopcs9 closed 4 months ago
This is also the case for glusterfs. Can you please fix it there too.
This is also the case for glusterfs. Can you please fix it there too.
I'm not sure about the current status as it is in disabled state for a while due to https://github.com/samba-in-kubernetes/sit-test-cases/issues/45. Should we still update simultaneously for GlusterFS?
I think we should then just go ahead with the current one. Better to test before adding the changes for glusterfs.
Hit these errors for centos-ci/xfs test. retesting to check if this was a transient error.
smbtorture 4.21.0pre1-UNKNOWN
Using seed 1707715874
time: 2024-02-12 05:31:14.858559Z
progress: 2
test: samba3.smb2.maximum_allowed.maximum_allowed
time: 2024-02-12 05:31:14.859175Z
Checked SEC_PRIV_RESTORE for S-1-5-21-3689626328-1371023801-1550821248-1000 - No
Checked SEC_PRIV_BACKUP for S-1-5-21-3689626328-1371023801-1550821248-1000 - No
Checked SEC_PRIV_SECURITY for S-1-5-21-3689626328-1371023801-1550821248-1000 - No
time: 2024-02-12 05:31:14.886761Z
xfail: samba3.smb2.maximum_allowed.maximum_allowed [
Exception: ../../source4/torture/smb2/max_allowed.c:161: status was NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED, expected NT_STATUS_OK: Incorrect status NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED - should be NT_STATUS_OK
]
test: samba3.smb2.maximum_allowed.read_only
time: 2024-02-12 05:31:14.886788Z
time: 2024-02-12 05:31:14.904874Z
failure: samba3.smb2.maximum_allowed.read_only [
Exception: ../../source4/torture/smb2/max_allowed.c:212: status was NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION, expected NT_STATUS_OK: smb2_create failed
]
/retest centos-ci/xfs
Hit these errors for centos-ci/xfs test. retesting to check if this was a transient error.
smbtorture 4.21.0pre1-UNKNOWN Using seed 1707715874 time: 2024-02-12 05:31:14.858559Z progress: 2 test: samba3.smb2.maximum_allowed.maximum_allowed time: 2024-02-12 05:31:14.859175Z Checked SEC_PRIV_RESTORE for S-1-5-21-3689626328-1371023801-1550821248-1000 - No Checked SEC_PRIV_BACKUP for S-1-5-21-3689626328-1371023801-1550821248-1000 - No Checked SEC_PRIV_SECURITY for S-1-5-21-3689626328-1371023801-1550821248-1000 - No time: 2024-02-12 05:31:14.886761Z xfail: samba3.smb2.maximum_allowed.maximum_allowed [ Exception: ../../source4/torture/smb2/max_allowed.c:161: status was NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED, expected NT_STATUS_OK: Incorrect status NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED - should be NT_STATUS_OK ] test: samba3.smb2.maximum_allowed.read_only time: 2024-02-12 05:31:14.886788Z time: 2024-02-12 05:31:14.904874Z failure: samba3.smb2.maximum_allowed.read_only [ Exception: ../../source4/torture/smb2/max_allowed.c:212: status was NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION, expected NT_STATUS_OK: smb2_create failed ]
See https://github.com/samba-in-kubernetes/sit-test-cases/issues/66. I have a possible pending merge request in upstream.
Thanks. Looks good.
Most of the tests from smb2.session test suite passes successfully on XFS without any extra setup. Therefore be specific about subtests which are to be ignored due to lack of special and/or proper server setup.