Open exolab opened 6 months ago
Hi @exolab and thanks for the report.
Do you have a better label than "namespace" for the cluster differentiation?
Do you know if redis_exporter exposes any cluster name?
Maybe by(service)
would work. But I am by no means an expert on this.
Hello @samber , I have same issue, my situation is setup a redis cluster with 3 master and 3 salve. Each master only handle part of slot:
This rule and RedisDisconnectedSlaves
will calculated a wrong result.
How about using this formula to determine the cluster status? redis_cluster_state{%(redisExporterSelector)s} == 0
Hi,
We are seeing this alert after deploying multiple Redis clusters in different namespaces. AFAICT Redis itself does not consider this setup a problem.
Does the alert not take this scenario into account, or are we mistaken in thinking we do not have a real problem?
Shouldn't the query be
count(redis_instance_info{role="master"}) by (namespace) > 1 or something similar that takes this scenario into account?
https://github.com/samber/awesome-prometheus-alerts/blame/826be5877ffc129ca3511cd25af87d67ea67fb48/_data/rules.yml#L795