search

samoht / assemblage

A collection of tools to manage the configuration of OCaml projects
54 stars 4 forks source link

Switch from cu to cunit #33

Closed dbuenzli closed 10 years ago

dbuenzli commented 10 years ago

It's vulgar in french. (working on this)

amirmc commented 10 years ago

The new one is arguably vulgar in english :)

dbuenzli commented 10 years ago

We don't care we speak french !

No but @samoht IIRC the problem with unit does not stem from value names so we could have val Assemblage.unit, `Unit, it's just the type that should not be unit, we could simply use unit_ for that (not that it's pretty but then we would be free of any vulgarity). Am I mistaken?

smondet commented 10 years ago

What would be wrong with compilation_unit?

dbuenzli commented 10 years ago

It's an edsl you don't won't long-winded names.

samoht commented 10 years ago

the unit_ type is good enough.

samoht commented 10 years ago

(or compilation_unit type)

dbuenzli commented 10 years ago

Fixed by #39.