Closed MehtapIsik closed 5 years ago
I like the idea of using separate submission IDs for references. We can use capital letters even to distinguish better: REF01
, REF02
, .... I had used previously nbXXX
scheme for non-blind pKa change predictions. Which one is preferable?
We can make plots of reference and blind submissions separately too, but I think we should keep the plots that show everything together as well.
I prefer that we update reference submissions in a new PR instead of reverting this. Is that acceptable?
Yes, a new PR is fine. And I'm enthusiastic about uppercase letters, REF01
etc sound good.
OK. @bergazin and I will update submission IDs accordingly.
This PR adds 2 reference calculations to logP challenge analysis:
zxcvb
- GAFF + tip3pzaqws
- GAFF + tip3pFBIt also corrects a file naming mistake of one of the blind submissions (
vzgyt-1559-logP-shin-1.csv
) which was interrupting the analysis script.