Open dolchchr opened 4 years ago
In my opinion, sorting by cases found is sufficient. If we have a large (> 50) number of biobanks participating, I would rather add additional filtering capability by biobank. At the end, the user has to mark all biobanks to negotiate with, which isn't doable with large amounts of biobanks and sorting certainly doesn't help here.
The addition of filter options to sorting options would be even more user-friendly.
The full result table is not sortable at the moment. It would be user-friendly if the results could be sorted by clicking on headings (small arrows up and down for ASC/DESC, see https://support.rstudio.com/hc/en-us/article_attachments/201725247/viewer.png)