Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
r562 changed this to throw RuntimeException, is that sufficient?
Original comment by heue...@gmail.com
on 28 Jul 2009 at 2:37
I wish it were but it's just way too subtle. It's way too easy to not notice a
RuntimeException. Since printing involves IO, the best approach (in my humble
opinion) is to force a checked exception. This is the kind of thing checked
exceptions are intended for.
Original comment by allain.lalonde
on 28 Jul 2009 at 3:55
What's a dedicated print method good for anyway? Isn't that better done in the
application rather than the library?
I'd vote for removing the method in 2.0.
Original comment by mr0...@mro.name
on 28 Jul 2009 at 9:03
I agree with removing it, but... we should provide a PrintingExample
demonstrating
how to do it.
Original comment by allain.lalonde
on 28 Jul 2009 at 12:04
Made it bubble up the exception in r1012
Original comment by allain.lalonde
on 17 Apr 2010 at 2:28
Original comment by heue...@gmail.com
on 26 Nov 2013 at 9:11
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
allain.lalonde
on 18 Jul 2009 at 11:45