Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I'll be cleaning up CheckStyle on core, then extras then swt. So, it'll
eventually
get fixed, but I'm going to invest my time where it'll give the project the
biggest bang.
Original comment by allain.lalonde
on 13 Oct 2009 at 3:54
OMG the code in there fails so many checkstyle rules because scope on so many
things
is left as package. Spec says that changing package scope to private scope
does not
break binary compatibility. So, I'm considering.
Original comment by allain.lalonde
on 14 Oct 2009 at 4:26
Spec I'm referring to is:
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/binaryComp.doc.html
Original comment by allain.lalonde
on 14 Oct 2009 at 4:28
I'll make the necessary updates to the class-level javadoc.
Original comment by heue...@gmail.com
on 26 Oct 2009 at 7:15
$ svn commit -m "Issue 133 ; cleaning up SWT package class-level javadoc"
Sending ...
Transmitting file data ...
Committed revision 822.
Original comment by heue...@gmail.com
on 26 Oct 2009 at 7:26
Original comment by allain.lalonde
on 30 Oct 2009 at 3:42
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
heue...@gmail.com
on 12 Oct 2009 at 6:56