Closed vruano closed 3 years ago
@vruano Were you planning to follow through on this? As the first step towards integrating symbolic alleles, it is very much needed for gatk-sv development.
Merging #1454 (e84c648) into master (34881ae) will decrease coverage by
0.001%
. The diff coverage is73.276%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1454 +/- ##
===============================================
- Coverage 69.418% 69.417% -0.001%
- Complexity 8940 8945 +5
===============================================
Files 604 605 +1
Lines 35632 35650 +18
Branches 5921 5928 +7
===============================================
+ Hits 24735 24747 +12
- Misses 8549 8557 +8
+ Partials 2348 2346 -2
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | Complexity Δ | |
---|---|---|---|
...htsjdk/variant/variantcontext/ByteArrayAllele.java | 69.136% <69.136%> (ø) |
46.000 <46.000> (?) |
|
.../htsjdk/variant/variantcontext/VariantContext.java | 78.245% <71.429%> (-0.128%) |
240.000 <3.000> (+2.000) |
:arrow_down: |
...ain/java/htsjdk/variant/variantcontext/Allele.java | 82.500% <85.714%> (+4.797%) |
52.000 <1.000> (-43.000) |
:arrow_up: |
...dk/samtools/util/SAMRecordPrefetchingIterator.java | 74.667% <0.000%> (-1.333%) |
13.000% <0.000%> (-1.000%) |
|
src/main/java/htsjdk/samtools/SAMRecord.java | 67.433% <0.000%> (-0.039%) |
303.000% <0.000%> (ø%) |
|
src/main/java/htsjdk/io/AsyncWriterPool.java | 73.611% <0.000%> (+1.389%) |
5.000% <0.000%> (ø%) |
|
...htsjdk/samtools/util/nio/DeleteOnExitPathHook.java | 90.476% <0.000%> (+9.524%) |
4.000% <0.000%> (+1.000%) |
@lbergelson addressed comments and it passes tests.
@vruano There's something about this branch that is making the diff show up with lots changes that are already in master. Have you rebased it recently?
Seems that the last rebase has fixed the issue with the additional master commit showing up. I never did anything different to the usual when rebasing so is kind of mystery to why it happened .... but now is gone :D
@lbergelson seems that the many-commit issues has dissipated by simply rebasing. Can you give it the ok and merge?
This is the first of a few commits/PR to refactor Allele as intended in the "Large" stale PR https://github.com/samtools/htsjdk/pull/1370
This first commit extracts an interface from Allele that becomes the new Allele common . class ejem interface, and the sole implementation is ByteArrayAllele that as the name states, uses a byte[] array to encode the allele bases, symbolic ID etc like the original Allele class. This change was suggested by @droazen.
ByteArrayAllele is not mean to be use publicly (package protection level). To instantiate it you should use the original Allele static create methods.
It also does some deprecation marking of unused or smelly methods like the "wouldBe*" and acceptableBases families.
@lbergelson Please review.