Closed bryevdv closed 7 years ago
Why don't we move it back to me? I'll put a prominent message saying "discontinued see
Sad end to a bright idea, but I haven't worked on Julia at all in several years. I entirely agree with you about not keeping obsolete projects hanging around.
@samuelcolvin I am happy to do that, let me look into what is required.
@samuelcolvin it looks like there is a big red "transfer ownership" button. I've also gotten no objection from @pzwang so as soon as you give me a final go-ahead I will make the transfer.
go ahead.
@samuelcolvin I get this message:
samuelcolvin/Bokeh.jl already exists and You can only transfer a repository from an organization to yourself at this time
It seems the options are:
just delete this repo, if your copy is up to date / sufficient
delete your version, and you would have to do the transfer (I think)
Done.
I deleted mine and did the transfer.
@samuelcolvin great, thanks! And thanks for lighting the way early on that it's possible to make other language bindings for Bokeh. I do hope some day Bokeh+Julia might get revisited.
No problem. Thanks for Bokeh.
There has been no work on Bokeh.jl in several years, and it has was last updated for Bokeh 0.4 which is ancient at this point. Although I think that Bokeh and Julia would make a terrific combination, there has also been no interest from the community in picking up maintenance of Bokeh.jl, despite a few different attempts to reach out.
Given that, rather than indefinitely host a hopelessly outdated project, I propose to delete this repo entirely, sometime before a Bokeh 1.0 release. Alternatively, I would also be amenable to moving this repo out of the Bokeh organization into another GH org or user account.
@bokeh/bokeh-julia @bokeh/dev