Request: make the introduction more clear

[mathiasbynens]

As someone unfamiliar with this functionality, this sentence tripped me up:

For example, a {} is isomorphic to a(function() {}) or a(1) {b()} is equivalent to a(1, function() {b()}).

The first example is easy to follow, but the second one really takes it to another level. Can this be elaborated upon a bit more in the introduction? Moving to code blocks vs. giving these code examples inline in a sentence would already help a great deal:

a {}
// → is equivalent to →
a(function() {})

a(1) { b() }
// → is equivalent to →
a(1, function() { b() })

[samuelgoto]

done, moved to code blocks and tried to explain a bit further.