Closed jcoyne closed 7 years ago
@jeremyf what do you think of this proposal?
The plan would be to replace those with functions as part of the callback? I can get behind that. It would move the configuration of emails out of the database and into a function.
@jeremyf I don't think I made myself clear. Presently it allows WorkflowState and WorkflowAction to be notifiable contexts. I'm positing that we don't need notifiable contexts for both states and actions. I think that notifications should happen only on WorkflowActions.
@jeremyf ping?
:arrow_up: @jeremyf comments?
Yes. Notifications need only happen for actions.
Jeremy Friesen
On Jan 10, 2017 12:30 PM, "Michael J. Giarlo" notifications@github.com wrote:
⬆️ @jeremyf https://github.com/jeremyf comments?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/projecthydra/curation_concerns/issues/1054#issuecomment-271640954, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAIUi3VIh_KVVmqfvev6_5KysB0Rm7Yks5rQ8AzgaJpZM4KVGMF .
OK, I'll move this to Hyrax. Thanks!
Moved to Hyrax: https://github.com/projecthydra-labs/hyrax/issues/231 Closing.
I think the notifiable_contexts in Sipity::WorkflowAction ought to be sufficient.