Closed mjgiarlo closed 9 years ago
If RDF::Vocabulary does not account for this info, maybe we should add it.
I suppose a minimal solution might be to simply insert a comment at the top of the generated module?
# Accessed 2014-12-10 22:24:67 -0500
If this is still a concern, it should be address in the new project https://github.com/ruby-rdf/rdf-vocab.
In particular, it seems like a good idea for vocabs to record the revision date of the vocabulary they represent.