Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Should be marked as enhancement.
Original comment by klemens....@gmail.com
on 8 Dec 2006 at 9:26
RPN would be great. Even without going to full RPN, some postfix notation would
be
welcome. In Mathematica for example, where both infix and postfix notations can
be used,
sin(pi/3)
can be alternatively typed pi/3 // sin
The // symbol is used to signify a postfix application of the function.
This will be useful specially when the "ans" variable has to be fed to a
function.
One could then type "ans // f" or even simply "// f".
Original comment by B.Houchm...@gmail.com
on 23 Feb 2007 at 9:59
There is indeed plan to support RPN. I mark this as Enhancement.
Original comment by ariya.hi...@gmail.com
on 16 Apr 2007 at 9:19
Original comment by helder.p...@gmail.com
on 12 Jun 2007 at 9:51
Original comment by helder.p...@gmail.com
on 16 Dec 2007 at 9:45
Calls to functions that take arbitraryly many parameters (like average) are
difficult
to encode in RPN. Suggestions?
Original comment by wolf.lam...@googlemail.com
on 21 Dec 2007 at 9:36
Just use the stack. It's not a problem unless there is a limited stack size.
For example:
123
123
123
123
123
5
avg
The last stack entry is the number of values, and you then pass that number of
preceding stack entries to the function.
Most (actually all) calculators I know use statistical functions for this type
of
stuff and that's generally totally separate from the normal notation used. It's
usually a table of values in memory that various calculations can be carried out
against. (Variance, standard deviation, mode, median, mean, correlation
coefficients
etc).
I'd suggest the same approach.
Original comment by MartinSG...@gmail.com
on 2 Jan 2008 at 12:40
Or you could use braces. Like
3 (12 4 + 8 2 3 * +) avg *
3 * avg ((12 + 4), (8 + (2 * 3)))
- mila
Original comment by xchmelmilos@gmail.com
on 19 Nov 2008 at 2:55
Yes, please do it... :-)
Original comment by sferra...@gmail.com
on 28 Jan 2009 at 10:17
As a long time HP 48GX user it would be superb to have such feature on
Speedcrunch.
Any update regarding this matter?
Original comment by ara...@gmail.com
on 24 May 2010 at 8:12
I look forward to see that implemented. I can't find any decent RPN calculator
for windows.
Original comment by brice.lenoir
on 23 May 2011 at 12:53
Brice - while we wait for speedcrunch - I have come to love xcalc (I have
assigned a hotkey - using AutoHotkey - to quickly toggle the minimal version of
xcalc, works very well)
Original comment by fraxi...@oxel.net
on 24 May 2011 at 12:12
Thanks for that! I used www.ecalc.com as well.
Original comment by brice.lenoir
on 24 May 2011 at 12:18
yet another hp user here. for the time being, using "galculator" on linux and
free42 on windows. hoping speedcrunch will catch up and do rpn one day
Original comment by ari.re...@gmail.com
on 21 Oct 2011 at 3:58
I'm also using RPN calculator and would like to see it as an option here too.
As mentioned in comment #7, the statistical functions are no problem in RPN.
You could even make it simpler .. clear stack - input numbers - avg - enter.
Only one limitation; the first entered value must not be zero!
Please, implement RPN! Pretty please...
Original comment by tim.to...@gmail.com
on 3 Jul 2014 at 7:50
I use REALCALC on my android phone as an excellent RPN calculator. I too would
like to see RPN implemented in speedcrunch.
Original comment by theron.j...@gmail.com
on 7 Nov 2014 at 3:12
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
klemens....@gmail.com
on 8 Dec 2006 at 8:38