Open abhinavgudipati opened 3 years ago
Looking forward to your prompt response! thanking you!
Hi @abhinavgudipati, thanks for testing it out. Can you elaborate a bit on what you mean by without giving outputs
? The binder example is using a sample data under the ./data
folder if that helps.
Hello! I am revisiting this issue again!, I am finding it a bit hard to understand why it is taking almost forever for the model to terminate running on binder!
I would like to know a possible alternative method here!
Also, I am struggling to understand the variables at play over here.
I have read the research paper referenced in this repo, but would like to know in brief on what we are trying to obtain towards the end, as I its taking forever on binder to terminate this program.
We will get this fixed. But meanwhile please note that the binder only gives an interface for test running - please download the codes from our latest release to run with full functionality.
@cannin and @judyueshen can you please take a look at the issue of binder?)
I want to ask how can I test the package on my own data. I have a fixed training and testing datasets, instead of splitting them in ratio, where should I change the code?
I want to ask how can I test the package on my own data. I have a fixed training and testing datasets, instead of splitting them in ratio, where should I change the code?
@restiso7788 Thanks for the question! Given the current implementation, the easiest way is to adapt the LOO
structure. The idea is to assume you have 2 drugs - i.e., drug_train
and drug_test
and leave-one-drug-out would then give you a nice train/test separation. You can refer to this factory function
https://github.com/sanderlab/CellBox/blob/93df2d094a04ec75197bf10099e8198f7de79185/cellbox/cellbox/dataset.py#L127-L150
and this demo input file data/loo_label.csv
for LOO runs.
However, the best way is to add a new function in the factory
that specifies train and test indices directly as an input file. You are more than welcome to create a pull request if you want to contribute that feature!
I have tried to run the command on Binder and got an output as follows.
Sincere apologies for a dumb doubt, but like I am not exactly able to understand how we are able to train a model without exactly giving any precise outputs?
All inputs are welcome..
Thanking you :)
@cannin @DesmondYuan @judyueshen