can play?

[sanderpick]

so far, @durwoodthegreat, @robinkraft, and @eightysteele have signed up ... boom. if we use this thing, i bet we'll quickly find out what needs to be added, what works, what sucks, etc.

boom

[andrewxhill]

boom

[sanderpick]

fuck yeah

On Monday, April 15, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Andrew W. Hill wrote:

boom

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416254).

[andrewxhill]

was on the default mac node v 0.6.x kept getting an error the other day. 0.10.x works though fyi

[sanderpick]

word … if you run the wolfpack-server locally, you may run into issues with 0.10.x … like specifically I think the time module needs 0.8.x .. will get updated soon im sure

On Monday, April 15, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Andrew W. Hill wrote:

was on the default mac node v 0.6.x kept getting an error the other day. 0.10.x works though fyi

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416314).

[andrewxhill]

k, gtk

[danhammer]

having trouble with node. soon to be on it.

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Andrew W. Hill notifications@github.comwrote:

k, gtk

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416548 .

[eightysteele]

When you install grr don't use sudo On Apr 15, 2013 4:02 PM, "Dan" notifications@github.com wrote:

having trouble with node. soon to be on it.

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Andrew W. Hill notifications@github.comwrote:

k, gtk

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub< https://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416548>

.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416640 .

[andrewxhill]

no, first do sudo rm /*

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Aaron Steele notifications@github.comwrote:

When you install grr don't use sudo On Apr 15, 2013 4:02 PM, "Dan" notifications@github.com wrote:

having trouble with node. soon to be on it.

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Andrew W. Hill < notifications@github.com>wrote:

k, gtk

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<

https://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416548>

.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub< https://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416640>

.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416789 .

andrew@vizzuality.com http://www.vizzuality.com

[andrewxhill]

don't do that

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Andrew Hill andrewxhill@gmail.com wrote:

no, first do sudo rm /*

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Aaron Steele notifications@github.comwrote:

When you install grr don't use sudo On Apr 15, 2013 4:02 PM, "Dan" notifications@github.com wrote:

having trouble with node. soon to be on it.

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Andrew W. Hill < notifications@github.com>wrote:

k, gtk

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<

https://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416548>

.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub< https://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416640>

.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416789 .

andrew@vizzuality.com http://www.vizzuality.com

andrew@vizzuality.com http://www.vizzuality.com

[sanderpick]

haha

On Monday, April 15, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Andrew W. Hill wrote:

no, first do
sudo rm /*

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Aaron Steele <notifications@github.com (mailto:notifications@github.com)>wrote:

When you install grr don't use sudo
On Apr 15, 2013 4:02 PM, "Dan" <notifications@github.com (mailto:notifications@github.com)> wrote:

having trouble with node. soon to be on it.

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Andrew W. Hill <
notifications@github.com (mailto:notifications@github.com)>wrote:

k, gtk

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<

https://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416548>

.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416640>

.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416789
.

andrew@vizzuality.com (mailto:andrew@vizzuality.com)
http://www.vizzuality.com

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416847).

[danhammer]

Oh fuck. I just erased everything.

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Sander Pick notifications@github.comwrote:

haha

On Monday, April 15, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Andrew W. Hill wrote:

no, first do sudo rm /*

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Aaron Steele <notifications@github.com(mailto: notifications@github.com)>wrote:

When you install grr don't use sudo On Apr 15, 2013 4:02 PM, "Dan" <notifications@github.com (mailto: notifications@github.com)> wrote:

having trouble with node. soon to be on it.

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Andrew W. Hill < notifications@github.com (mailto:notifications@github.com)>wrote:

k, gtk

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<

https://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416548>

.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<

https://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416640>

.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub< https://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416789>

.

andrew@vizzuality.com (mailto:andrew@vizzuality.com) http://www.vizzuality.com

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub ( https://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416847).

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416902 .

[robinkraft]

Right - it's sudo rm -rf /*

:D

On Apr 15, 2013, at 4:08 PM, Sander Pick notifications@github.com wrote:

haha

On Monday, April 15, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Andrew W. Hill wrote:

no, first do sudo rm /*

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Aaron Steele <notifications@github.com (mailto:notifications@github.com)>wrote:

When you install grr don't use sudo On Apr 15, 2013 4:02 PM, "Dan" <notifications@github.com (mailto:notifications@github.com)> wrote:

having trouble with node. soon to be on it.

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Andrew W. Hill < notifications@github.com (mailto:notifications@github.com)>wrote:

k, gtk

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<

https://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416548>

.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub< https://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416640>

.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416789 .

andrew@vizzuality.com (mailto:andrew@vizzuality.com) http://www.vizzuality.com

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416847).

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[andrewxhill]

Ah yeah yeah, good catch

[andrewxhill]

You aren't real men until you have hit enter on that one

[sanderpick]

@eightysteele without sudo was it able to add grr to your PATH?

[sanderpick]

russian roulette with random commands ...

[andrewxhill]

i did no sudo grr install and it worked fine

[sanderpick]

i must have diff permissions on local .

[eightysteele]

Amazing On Apr 15, 2013 4:10 PM, "Andrew W. Hill" notifications@github.com wrote:

You aren't real men until you have hit enter on that one

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16416995 .

[andrewxhill]

yeah, tbh i fubared some things on my mac over the past few days. see this comment https://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16417056

[andrewxhill]

so i think like /usr/local/var and stuff are now pretty globally usable. but also I thought npm was primarily non-sudo?

[sanderpick]

listing tasks would be cool ..... or just updates for that day if we are not parsing responses into tasks yet...

what i really want is,

grr massage --happy_ending

[sanderpick]

it is non-sudo but the package.json in grr instructs it to link the executable into /user/local/bin ... which is usually sudo only, i think

[eightysteele]

Easter egg #1 On Apr 15, 2013 4:16 PM, "Sander Pick" notifications@github.com wrote:

listing tasks would be cool ..... or just updates for that day if we are not parsing responses into tasks yet...

what i really want is,

grr massage --happy_ending

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16417273 .

[andrewxhill]

one of the earliest things we should consider adding is the # parse for github issues. then you could quickly review tickets mentioned in a teams email.

grr team list issues pretty_print

[andrewxhill]

i guess we would want to parse full github issues urls, not #numbers

[robinkraft]

+1

On Apr 15, 2013, at 4:19 PM, "Andrew W. Hill" notifications@github.com wrote:

one of the earliest things we should consider adding is the # parse for github issues. then you could quickly review tickets mentioned in a teams email.

grr team list issues pretty_print

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[andrewxhill]

team member	project	issue
pick	wolfpack	#1
steele	mol	#1000
kraft	wri	#222

to start

[sanderpick]

we could have syntax that made it easier to link .... haha, just saw ^^^^ ... +1 dude

[eightysteele]

+1 On Apr 15, 2013 4:20 PM, "Andrew W. Hill" notifications@github.com wrote:

i guess we would want to parse full github issues urls, not #numbers

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16417498 .

[sanderpick]

we should also consider if the current one-way team arch is what we want ... its more like google circles right now ... it makes for more flex but may not have the intended teams functionality that we originally discussed ..

[andrewxhill]

I def can see the ease of it just as it is. Not sure.

[danhammer]

i'm in, by the way.

[andrewxhill]

what if it was like it is, but then I worked on projects so I could markup my email a bit

single line single word = project name

cartodb

today i worked on issue #222, #22 with @someotherperson

wri

closing the ie issues with the slider

etc

[andrewxhill]

so then, i could subscribe to teams and/or projects

[eightysteele]

Dude yes I like that a lot subscribing to a project or team is gold On Apr 15, 2013 4:30 PM, "Andrew W. Hill" notifications@github.com wrote:

so then, i could subscribe to teams and/or projects

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16417858 .

[andrewxhill]

I feel like we are going to want a bit more controlled structure/vocab. One of the biggest wins I think it could have is if, say we were all working on the wri project and adding news bits each day. As a proj manager or whatever, I'd love to run

grr project news wri week

and it would give me an itemized news list for the week on the project. i wouldn't really want pithy things, just short sweet tidbits, close to what you would dump into a NEWS.md file no?

[andrewxhill]

Things I want to know,

what projects were worked on what issues were discussed what issues were closed

others?

[sanderpick]

yeah dig it (re: https://github.com/sanderpick/wolfpack-cli/issues/2#issuecomment-16417851).... if we ride on the current one-way teams... it would be more like subscribing to a project or person ... in other words, adding a project or a person to a team.

grr teams add <username || projectname> <teamname>

right?

[sanderpick]

yes man... love that perspective ...

[sanderpick]

unless for projects, you could skip the team abstraction and just follow it standalone like ... that's prob better

[sanderpick]

marinating for now ... i will write up some basic notes on the overall arch / developing ... and through in a wiki (cli and server)

[andrewxhill]

right, i really like the idea of subscribing to people or projects or both and letting the system put it all together for you in a structured, non repetitive, email