Open rileyjmurray opened 5 months ago
@rileyjmurray What version of pyGSTi were you running this on? I'm trying to reproduce on current develop and failing to do so (both commenting/uncommenting the availability line succeed).
Sorry for the slow response, @sserita.
I used a permalink to the version of the code I was running. It points to a specific commit on develop. Here's a permalink to the state of the whole pyGSTi repo at the relevant commit https://github.com/sandialabs/pyGSTi/tree/690542693c4fe23afb1d7995058660ed9e989457.
Describe the bug The docstring for QuditProcessorSpec has a mistake for the "availability" keyword argument. The existing code is ...
https://github.com/sandialabs/pyGSTi/blob/2d4fe845fca84bc10adc2625947ddd3679abece2/pygsti/processors/processorspec.py#L85-L94
The relevant substring in the docstring is
I'm not sure what the actual behavior is, but I've given code below which shows that the behavior is different from the docstring.
To Reproduce
Expected behavior The behavior described in the docstring.