Closed mathstuf closed 5 months ago
Yes, that is probably a good idea. At one time, we had a build system where the <>
includes were required or strongly recommended, but that is no longer being used and the current includes use a mismash of ""
and <>
. Would be good to be consistent and probably consistently use ""
Does #423 address this issue. It has been merged.
Looks OK to me; I'll be back if we find an issue (next time we bump IOSS). I'll leave you to close according to your workflow.
This requires that an explicit
-I
be passed for the headers to find each other. It would be better if the library could include its own headers using""
paths relative to the header itself.