sanger / limber

A config-driven LIMS built on Sequencescape, primarily for running library preparation pipelines in the laboratory
MIT License
4 stars 8 forks source link

DPL-971 Create 007c version of 'Bespoke Chromium 5 prime' pipelines #1444

Closed KatyTaylor closed 5 months ago

KatyTaylor commented 1 year ago

User story Duplicate the 'Bespoke Chromium 5 prime' pipeline in Limber, but with new purposes containing the word 'GEM-X'. This is so we can make the change in https://github.com/sanger/limber/issues/1397 in just the GEM-X version, and so that plates going down the GEM-X route can be distinguished visually from plates going down the standard route. In the future, we will probably want 'GEM-X' versions of the other Chromium pipelines (3', BCR, TCR), but just make the 5 prime version for now.

Who are the primary contacts for this story Katy, Lesley, Abby

Who is the nominated tester for UAT It can be tested along with https://github.com/sanger/limber/issues/1397 when that's ready.

Acceptance criteria To be considered successful the solution must allow:

Additional context At some point after the GEM-X pipeline is set up, the library type 'Chromium single cell 5 prime HT v2' should probably be removed from the 'Bespoke Chromium 5p' pipeline? Is this comment still relevant after the change from 'HT' to 'GEM-X'?

When we renamed the Library Type names from HT to GEM-X. We were not sure about the suffixes at the end of the name. We have incremented the versions to v3 and v4 now. Slack Thread: https://sanger-global.slack.com/archives/C05F21NKATD/p1718119423377069

Chromium single cell 5 prime GEM-X v3
# Chromium single cell 3 prime GEM-X v4
# Chromium single cell BCR GEM-X
# Chromium single cell TCR GEM-X
KatyTaylor commented 7 months ago

Ideas from Andrew for bed verification on aggregation steps:

andrewsparkes commented 7 months ago

Ticked off some checkboxes for config that got created as part of the DPL-924 story.

KatyTaylor commented 6 months ago

Updated description, anticipating the decision to go with the GEM-X chip rather than the HT chip.

KatyTaylor commented 6 months ago

Removing on hold label following decision to go with the GEM-X chip. Also discussed whether to provide option to skip aggregation and cherrypicking steps - decided not.

yoldas commented 6 months ago

We have done the name change for the below in the story DPL-919 #1392 . They are within the scope of the DPL-924 PR #1673 referred by the first criterion.

LRC GEM-X 5p Chip LRC GEM-X 5p GEMs LRC GEM-X 5p cDNA PCR LRC GEM-X 5p cDNA PCR XP LRC GEM-X 5p cDNA Input LRC GEM-X 5p Aggregate LRC GEM-X 5p Cherrypick LRC GEM-X 5p GEX Dil limber_scrna_core_chromium_gem_x_5p_aggregation hamilton_lrc_gem_x_5p_cherrypick_to_lrc_gem_x_5p_gex_dil limber_scrna_core_chromium_gem_x_5p

KatyTaylor commented 5 months ago

PRs:

SS - https://github.com/sanger/sequencescape/pull/4157 Limber - https://github.com/sanger/limber/pull/1733 Int Suite - https://gitlab.internal.sanger.ac.uk/psd/integration-suite/-/merge_requests/136