sanger / limber

A flexible lims extension of the old app
MIT License
3 stars 8 forks source link

[ruby] Update rspec-rails 6.1.2 → 6.1.3 (patch) #1751

Closed depfu[bot] closed 1 day ago

depfu[bot] commented 1 week ago

Here is everything you need to know about this upgrade. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ rspec-rails (6.1.2 → 6.1.3) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.1.3 (from changelog)

Full Changelog

Bug Fixes:

  • Reset ActiveSupport::CurrentAttributes between examples. (Javier Julio, #2752)
  • Fix a broken link in generated mailer previews. (Chiara Núñez, #2764)
  • Fix have_status_code behaviour with deprecated status names by delegating to Rack::Utils.status_code/1 to set the expected status code. (Darren Boyd, #2765)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 16 commits:

↗️ rspec-expectations (indirect, 3.13.0 → 3.13.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

3.13.1 (from changelog)

Full Changelog

Bug Fixes:

  • Fix the "false positive" warning message when using a negated raise_error matcher with a RegExp instance. (Eric Mueller, #1456)

Enhancements:

  • Improve the IO emulation in the output capture matchers (output(...).to_stdout et al) by adding as_tty and as_not_tty to change the tty? flags. (Sergio Gil Pérez de la Manga, #1459)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 6 commits:

↗️ rspec-mocks (indirect, 3.13.0 → 3.13.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

3.13.1 (from changelog)

Full Changelog

Bug Fixes:

  • Use RSpec::Support::Mutex in RSpec::Mocks::Proxy to avoid issues from stubbing ::Mutex#new. (Eric Mueller, #1575)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 5 commits:


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)
codecov[bot] commented 1 week ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 91.27%. Comparing base (0f6fb38) to head (5597551).

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #1751 +/- ## ======================================== Coverage 91.27% 91.27% ======================================== Files 370 370 Lines 7584 7584 ======================================== Hits 6922 6922 Misses 662 662 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/sanger/limber/pull/1751/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=sanger) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [javascript](https://app.codecov.io/gh/sanger/limber/pull/1751/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=sanger) | `93.65% <ø> (ø)` | | | [pull_request](https://app.codecov.io/gh/sanger/limber/pull/1751/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=sanger) | `91.27% <ø> (?)` | | | [push](https://app.codecov.io/gh/sanger/limber/pull/1751/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=sanger) | `91.27% <ø> (ø)` | | | [ruby](https://app.codecov.io/gh/sanger/limber/pull/1751/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=sanger) | `90.93% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=sanger#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

codeclimate[bot] commented 1 week ago

Code Climate has analyzed commit 55975516 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold).

This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 90.9% (0.0% change).

View more on Code Climate.