Y24-300 - Addition of anonymous ids for public data sharing - existing data

[KatyTaylor]

User story As a member of GSU, I would like RVI samples already imported into Sequencescape to have an anonymous id added to them, so that when they are shared in public databases, the id does not give any unnecessary information.

Who are the primary contacts for this story Anna G, Adrianne L

Who is the nominated tester for UAT Anna G, Ya-Lin H

Acceptance criteria To be considered successful the solution must allow:

• [ ] Samples previously imported into Sequencescape for RVI should have an id created and inserted into the public name (?) field
• [ ] Id is created using Baracoda (WSI prefix)

References This story has a non-blocking relationship with:

• https://github.com/sanger/limber/issues/1851
• https://github.com/sanger/limber/issues/1895

Additional context The data for these already imported samples has not yet been released.

Original request from Anna: "GSU would like to apply additional level of security in relation to sample IDs. This will need to be applied to future and all retrospective samples within RVI." (was split into 3 stories).

N.B. Is it worth checking before doing this story if the Sanger Sample Id would be sufficient? Is this used for existing samples in other studies? We discussed using the accession number but think this is not appropriate because it is specific to EBI and this will potentially be released to other databases as well.

[TWJW-SANGER]

I know we discussed that the WSI prefix would be used for the Anon ID could it be the RVI one instead. It’s still anon enough not to distinguish location.