SujitDey2022
commented
3 hours ago @Danniw373 I have created a research story for PSD to look into the particular ask. Please could you confirm the details of the story as expected.
Here is the link to our PSD refinement session of this request for reference.
Also, I have tagged this as Long Read but wanted to understand whether the HiC process in LIMBER is a Long Read pipeline?
User story As a Long Read Team Lead (Danni W.) I WANT to be able to print unique label for the normalised XP plate in LIMBER SO THAT the plate can be tracked quality issues arising from this missing information can be identified in time.
Details: In the HiC process, the XP plate is normalised on the Beckman creating a new plate. This new normalised plate does not exist in Limber so is not tracked and a unique barcode is not created. Currently the team are using the XP barcode then annotating the barcode with "norm", this is then tapped together with the XP plate.
This requirement of unique identification is necessary from a quality perspective and applies on all HiC Library Types as the plate contents may differ and cause issues in identifying the right plate.
Who are the primary contacts for this story Danni W.
Who is the nominated tester for UAT Danni W.
Acceptance criteria The objective of this story is to identify solution options from the following or otherwise,
Dependencies This story is blocked by the following dependencies:
References This story has a non-blocking relationship with:
Additional context [James W.] Having a barcode is higher priority v/s pipeline implementation.