haihuanzxx
commented
6 years ago my test code is the above according to offical code, but the detection time is more than 31.9ms(plubic in the paper). My GPU is Titan X ./tools/test_net.py --net models/pvanet/pva9.1/PVA9.1_ImgNet_COCO_VOC0712plus_compressed.caffemodel --def models/pvanet/pva9.1/faster_rcnn_train_test_ft_rcnn_only_plus_comp.pt --cfg models/pvanet/cfgs/submit_1019.yml --gpu 0
m_detect: 3085/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3086/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3087/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3088/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3089/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3090/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3091/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3092/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3093/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3094/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3095/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3096/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3097/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3098/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3099/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3100/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3101/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3102/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3103/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3104/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3105/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3106/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3107/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3108/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3109/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3110/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3111/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3112/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3113/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3114/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3115/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3116/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3117/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3118/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3119/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3120/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3121/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3122/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s im_detect: 3123/4952 net 0.081s preproc 0.009s postproc 0.000s misc 0.012s detect 0.090s
Hi @sanghoon Is the pva9.1 faster than zf-faster-rcnn? If faster,how much. Is the pva9.1 faster than the version of pva9.1 compression? If faster,how much.