Open calderonsj opened 7 years ago
this is the geometry.
Thank you for the report! I'll take a look ASAP!
That is probably related with the boundary-integrals formulation.
In the way the gradient of the pressure is computed, errors of order 1 can be expected, and therefore heavy problems. Also the viscous term would not help at all.
I'm trying to develop a boundary condition similar to the applied by Bousscase in his thesis
@calderonsj How long should you wait to see the artifacts?
It has been found that when carrying out a 3D simulation of a tank with no movement particles disorder massively, inducing undesirable accelerations for some of the particles which end up with them at non-physical positions and hence huge forces appear. This suggests that some variable may tend to zero at a point for some of the particles. The main consequence is a loss of height of the filling level after several seconds of simulation. Boundary integrals methodology at the boundaries is used.
Different values of speed of sound have been tried. Other alternatives, such as 2D simulations and 3D simulations with different resolutions may be tried in order to find the source of this unexpected behaviour.
Another possibility is moving to a semi-analytic formulation instead of the pure numerical formulation used in the code, but I would like to ask for other opinions that might solve the issue.
Please find attached here the case, that has been run for version 3.0.
Thank you
StationaryTank.zip