Closed Feeeenng closed 7 years ago
ref #913
You can use request.app
in a handler function to access it.
@CharAct3
from sanic import request
current_app = request.app
AttributeError: module 'sanic.request' has no attribute 'app'
@app.route("/")
async def test(request):
current_app = request.app
return json({"hello": "world"})
@CharAct3 but some function is outside use. not only is inside request . l hope is :
from sanic import request
def test():
current_app = request.app
return current_app.id
@app.route('/)
async def index(request):
id = test()
return json({"id",id})
You can always pass app
as function param.
maybe helpful, https://github.com/channelcat/sanic/issues/845
in your example, you can do sth like.
def test(app):
return app.id
@app.route('/)
async def index(request):
id = test(request.app)
return json({"id",id})
@yunstanford thx. if is class .how to can use current_app ? from flask import session . In sanic . how to use the ?
Sanic doesn't have builtin session support, but you can use extension, https://github.com/subyraman/sanic_session, similar to https://pythonhosted.org/Flask-Session/
@r0fls, @seemethere, @messense, @yunstanford, can we close the Q&A types of issues? This is becoming a lot like an IRC log and it's getting harder to track real issues. Hell, if it was gitter/IRC/slack I might even be so inclined to answer those as well.
@yunstanford please don't think I don't appreciate your perseverance in answering all of the questions, though. I'm just thinking you could get paid in SO reputation :)
Since the question has diverged, I agree we should close this. Please keep questions within issues restricted to Sanic specifics in general.
I'm not sure that closing questions one by one upon divergence would cut it. Maybe we should redirect them to sanic
tag on SO and start watching that? We could end up getting free moderation and editing from the ever present mods there - and just wrapping people's code/output in code segments would be enough.
In the meantime, I'll try to answer some of those so we can start closing them here.
please close question. the question has been resolved .
@jrocketfingers I think it's ok to ask Sanic related questions in the issues, we have the questions tag for it. However the issues are definitely ballooning, which is a problem.
Open an issue about issues balooning! :) Jokes aside, yeah, a question
label would help tremendously, as I'm just looking for a way not to drown
things like found a memory leak
in a bunch of questions. Other than that,
yeah, I agree that Sanic's is still too small a community to necessitate
the split between but tracking and questions.
On Sep 4, 2017 9:02 AM, "Raphael Deem" notifications@github.com wrote:
@jrocketfingers https://github.com/jrocketfingers I think it's ok to ask Sanic related questions in the issues, we have the questions tag for it. However the issues are definitely ballooning, which is a problem.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/channelcat/sanic/issues/921#issuecomment-326881797, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACtqPN0HEHf255CYojifgIGCaWAOoMOUks5se6CKgaJpZM4PFxnF .
When you instantiate a Sanic instance, that can be retrieved at a later time from the Sanic app registry. This can be useful, for example, if you need to access your Sanic instance from a location where it is not otherwise accessible.
Here you go:
# ./path/to/server.py
from sanic import Sanic
app = Sanic("my_awesome_server")
# ./path/to/somewhere_else.py
from sanic import Sanic
app = Sanic.get_app("my_awesome_server")
Flask get current app is from flask import current_app
How to can get 'current_app' in Sanic ?