Open sanjarcode opened 2 years ago
The question now is, if something should not be thought as an automation, what to think/categorize it as?
Leave it uncategorised?
And why do I feel the need for a fundamental categorization?
Did the default categorization of 'automation' help decrease cognitive load. Maybe.
Goal: think and write about this. It's important.
Some categories of innovations/inventions of the 20th century https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Academy_of_Engineering#:~:text=The%20ranked%20list,High-performance%20Materials
The list in the link above can be classified as per https://github.com/non-tech-stuff/sanjar-PVS/issues/5, into:
I have developed a mindset where I have come to categorize every invention/activity/innovation as an automation.
This may be true, if the universe is considered as an information system.
But on the surface, or as a first thought - things may not be automation, and it may be better for me to not think of them as being one.
e.g. chemistry, physics - from a human perspective didn't start as automation, though of course it helps predict the future (short time - like Newton's laws of motion) and nature of things around us.
Other examples can be space travel, or invention of the wheel. They may have helped us automate something, but it's not helpful to think of them as automation when creating them.