Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
I too would really like this functionality. It seems like it would be a lot
easier to implement, because it's a matter of pulling the stuff back together
and inserting missing keywords.
Also, it might be possible to implement something with
"PREG_SPLIT_OFFSET_CAPTURE" option, which would allow capturing the indexes of
the original keyword locations. So once you have the index, you can find and
replace specific data elements. I'm trying to implement this solution myself
for my own usage - I need to rename table aliases in a query on-the-fly.
I'll post updates to my attempts to implement here.
Original comment by kbacht...@gmail.com
on 20 Oct 2011 at 3:55
Attempting to use PREG_SPLIT_OFFSET_CAPTURE requires many, many changes to
handle all the tokens now being arrays instead of strings. Nix on that route.
Reverse parsing, i.e., combining looks to be a promising route. I have a
proto-type concept begun here which works for really base INSERT and SELECT
statements (no FROM yet or any other clause). Would basically need to be
completed for each clause by reverse-engineering the parsing process.
function combine($result) {
$combine = '';
foreach ($result as $key => $value)
if ($key == "INSERT") {
$table = $value['table'];
$cols = $value['cols'];
$combine.= 'INSERT INTO ';
$combine.= '`'.$table.'`';
if (is_array($cols))
$combine.=' (`'.join('`, `', $cols).'`) ';
else
$combine.=' ';
} else if ($key == "VALUES") {
$combine.= 'VALUES '.join('', $value);
} else if ($key == "SELECT") {
$combine.='SELECT ';
$combine.=combine_select($value);
}
var_dump($combine);
return $combine;
}
function combine_select($arr) {
$combine='';
$first=true;
foreach ($arr as $fieldref) {
$expr_type = $fieldref['expr_type'];
$base_expr = trim($fieldref['base_expr']);
$alias = $fieldref['alias'];
$sub_tree = $fieldref['sub_tree'];
if (!$first) $combine.=', ';
if (!$sub_tree) {
$combine.=$base_expr;
} else {
$combine.=combine_subtree($sub_tree);
}
$combine.=' AS '.$alias;
$first=false;
}
return $combine;
}
function combine_subtree($subtree) {
$combine='';
foreach ($subtree as $fieldref) {
$expr_type = $fieldref['expr_type'];
$base_expr = trim($fieldref['base_expr']);
$sub_tree = $fieldref['sub_tree'];
if (!$sub_tree)
$combine.=$base_expr;
else
$combine.=combine_subtree($sub_tree);
}
return $combine;
}
Original comment by kbacht...@gmail.com
on 20 Oct 2011 at 4:48
However, this method will have a number of side-effects. First off, the query
will have a lot of changes from the original, even if all you do is parse and
re-combine without any changes. This is because the parser removes a lot of
contextual information, such as which column names were backticked, spacing of
the SQL code, etc. Also, there look to be a few miscellaneous bugs that will
have to be resolved (such as select * showing up as `*` being the alias for an
operator *). If these things are okay, then this is a promising route - would
be a lot easier if the original author of the code would step in and build
something like this :-)
Original comment by kbacht...@gmail.com
on 20 Oct 2011 at 4:51
Maybe it is possible with the new version, because the output tree contains
more information. I use the parser to translate the MySQL dialect into an
Oracle dialect, at the moment I use the new "position" to replace some parts
within the original statement. It could be simpler to create a complete new
statement.
Original comment by pho...@gmx.de
on 2 Feb 2012 at 8:30
I have created a builder called php-sql-creator.php Maybe it is useful for you.
I think, there can be a problem on expressions like "(a or b) and c". The
parser doesn't save the parenthesis in the current version, so the re-created
SQL can be wrong on that point.
Check it out from
https://www.phosco.info/publicsvn/php-sql-parser/tags/20120215 or try the
bleeding edge on trunk.
Original comment by pho...@gmx.de
on 15 Feb 2012 at 4:12
Can I close this issue (try the phpsqlcreator class)?
Original comment by pho...@gmx.de
on 13 Mar 2012 at 12:07
Use PhPSQLCreator class to create an SQl statement from the parser result.
Original comment by pho...@gmx.de
on 21 Mar 2012 at 11:23
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
saku...@gmail.com
on 26 Aug 2011 at 4:31