Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Can you check the REV 240? I'm not sure, that I have understand you right.
There is a test case for issue 41, is it correct?
Original comment by pho...@gmx.de
on 26 Apr 2012 at 11:51
additional information:
It is simpler to set value/expression types instead of JOINS. To find out,
which columns of the WHERE clause are part of the join, I have to look for
aliases too. This can be complicated, if you have subqueries instead of real
tables. So the parser returns a simple truth, it is indeed an expression, but
it is on your code to change the classification. If you use joins and their
ON-clause, you will get the join columns as extra subtree.
Original comment by pho...@gmx.de
on 30 Apr 2012 at 7:49
no comment from reporter
Original comment by pho...@gmx.de
on 2 May 2012 at 12:39
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
kersn...@gmail.com
on 10 Apr 2012 at 11:53