Closed drdhaval2785 closed 7 years ago
Jones.
Mack.
Copenh.
Pet.
IO.
W.
Oxf.
Cambr.
Paris.
Hall.
L.
Khn.
K.
Kh.
B.
Report.
Ben.
Lgr.
Bik.
Tüb.
Haug.
Kāṭm.
Pheh.
Rādh.
NW.
Oudh
Oudh.
NP.
Brl.
Burnell.
Bl.
BA.
Gu.
Mysore.
Lahore.
Bh.
P.
Bhk.
Bhr.
Poona.
Kāśīn.
Lahore
Bonn.
Jac.
H.
Vienna.
Taylor.
Oppert.
Rice.
Peters.
W.
BP.
Bühler.
SB.
D.
Sūcīpattra.
ASB.
Bhau Dāji.
BL.
Cs.
CU. add.
Devīpr.
Fl.
GB.
Goldstücker.
Gov. Or. Libr. Madras.
Hz.
IO.
L.
Lund.
Oudh XX.
Peters.
Rgb.
Stein.
Ulwar.
Weber.
Adyar Library.
AK.
AS.
Ashburner.
BC.
Bd.
Cr.
CS.
Edinburgh University Library
Hpr.
Hz.
IL.
Jl.
Lz.
Peters.
Rep.
Tb.
Cg.
Tod.
Whish.
96 catalogues mentioned books in ACC.
That's an interesting research.
Bühler.
Seems there are many "parts" of names and similar.
Readme in response to Jim's request. Also put in the dev server repo.
re.findall(u'^<P>[0-9]+[.] {%([^\%]+)\%\}',line,re.U)
python list_catalogues.py ../../../orig/acc4.txt catalogue_names.txt
catalogue_names.txt
This file has a total of 96 abbreviations of catalogues / works explicitly referred to in three volumes of ACC.
These abbreviations can be used to tag various literary resources.
Identify the works which are not explicitly mentioned in bibliography.
Now I have started applying the list mentioned above to the acc4.txt to tag the catalogues properly. As this is a Literary Source kind of research (Same as PW or PWG), I have started a separate ACC repository for discussion. https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/ACC/issues/1 tracks the progress of this work.
I have started a separate ACC repository for discussion.
Yeah, just wanted to note that Cologne folder was not a wise idea if you wanted to dive that deep.
Agree - good idea. We may want to use dictionary repositories for documenting, discussing such dictionary specific work.
Are you aiming towards an acc5.txt?
Yes. orig/acc5.txt added now.
Further discussion on ACC issue 1, if needed.
For record, acc5_stats.py is the code and acc5_stats.txt is the result which shows the distribution of various literary resources in ACC. As of 7 June 2017
Oppert:7098
Burnell:4537
L:4422
B:4208
Oudh:4049
Peters:3911
IO:3779
Oxf:3185
Stein:3006
NP:2895
Ulwar:2690
Ben:2631
K:2353
Rādh:2193
NW:2034
Rice:1917
W:1698
AS:1678
Hall:1506
Lz:1332
Bik:1297
Hz:1279
Gov. Or. Libr. Madras:1206
CS:1173
Taylor:1055
Bhr:1039
Rgb:1038
Bd:982
AK:940
BP:861
SB:732
Pheh:685
Hpr:661
Paris:643
Poona:628
Report:625
Mack:625
Fl:606
P:583
Khn:583
Bhk:530
Skm:496
Bühler:487
Śg:475
Kh:456
Cs:450
Sūcīpattra:447
H:431
Bhau Dāji:389
Sbhv:379
Kāṭm:367
Haug:363
BC:348
BL:330
ASB:329
D:327
Tb:321
Whish:320
Tüb:296
Mysore:274
Śp:273
Brl:201
Lahore:200
Gu:168
CU. add:162
Kāśīn:160
Cambr:150
Pet:137
GB:126
Bh:123
Rāyamukuṭa:115
Bl:108
IL:103
Cop:101
Devīpr:96
Lgr:93
Cr:91
Weber:85
Jac:69
Jones:63
Jl:62
Lahore 1882:58
BA:57
Adyar Libr:52
Tod:49
Vienna:31
Ashburner:15
Goldstücker:15
Lund:14
Bonn:8
Edinburgh:4
What is relation between the 'list of literary resources' shown in previous comment and the '96 catalogues' of first comment? Are the two lists identical (probably not) ? Almost identical (hopefully)?
What is relation between the 'list of literary resources' shown in previous comment and the '96 catalogues' of first comment? Are the two lists identical (probably not) ? Almost identical (hopefully)?
Not identical. Almost identical, yes. I guess only difference is that Oudh appears thrice invthe 96 list. They carry not significant difference. So treated once in our list.
There are some catalogues from where the author gives references in ACC. Preface / foreword somewhere may give hint to the bibliography referred to in ACC. Otherwise manual examination will give us some idea regarding identification of the catalogue abbreviations.
See Oppert, Rice, Taylor etc.
There are 96 catalogues mentioned books in ACC.