search

sanskrit-lexicon / CORRECTIONS

Correction history for Cologne Sanskrit Lexicon
8 stars 5 forks source link

2-grams vs MW, part 8 #225

Closed drdhaval2785 closed 8 years ago

drdhaval2785 commented 8 years ago

189 continued

drdhaval2785 commented 8 years ago

151-155

ccs:viDafMAR,22471:viDarman:t:MA
pui:vinDyamOxIyas,12940:vinDyamOLIyas:t:xI,Ox
vei:vipaScitdfQajayantalOhitya,2953:vipaScitdfQajayantalOhitya:n:td-multiheadword
vei:vipaScitSakunimitrapArASarya,2954:vipaScitSakunimitrapArASarya:n:tS-multiheadword
wil:vimbeHzWa,35577:vimb0zWa:t:eH
drdhaval2785 commented 8 years ago

156-160

wil:vizRugwaha,36137:vizRugfha:t:gw-gf orthographic confusion
ieg:visatiaWUprasTa,6660:visatiaWUprasTa:n:ia
mw72:vIl2aya,44641:vILaya:t:l2,2a-already corrected
mw72:vIl2ita,44642:vILita:t:l2,2i-already corrected
acc:vfhatSivapUjAprayoga,47215:vfhatSivapUjAprayoga:n:tS-multiheadword
drdhaval2785 commented 8 years ago

161-165

mw72:vrIl2ana,45911:vrILana:t:l2,2a-already corrected
acc:SabdasaMgrahaniGaRwuagastyaprokta,47095:SabdasaMgrahaniGaRwuagastyaprokta:n:ua-multiheadword
vei:Saraarcatka,3179:Saraarcatka:n:aa-multiheadword
wil:SAntigwaha,38074:SAntigwaha:n:gw-gf orthographic confusion
vei:SitibAhuEzakftanEmiSi,3273:SitibAhuEzakftanEmiSi:n:uE-multiheadword
drdhaval2785 commented 8 years ago

166-170

inm:SineHpOtra,2640:SineHpOtra:n:eH
inm:SineHsuta,2641:SineHsuta:n:eH
acc:SivarahasyefBugItA,41336:SivarahasyefBugItA:n:ef-multiheadword
pe:SekkizhAr,6552:SekkizhAr:n:zh-Tamil name
md:zaLUnA,18421:zaLUnA:n:LU
drdhaval2785 commented 8 years ago

171-175

pui:zawbrahmARa,15058:zawbrahmARa:n:wb ?zawbrAhmaRa
krm:zfnBu,1851:zfnBu:n:zf
krm:zex,1853:zelf:t:ex
shs:zwFh,41525:zwFh:n:wF
ccs:saMorahAra,26627:saMprahAra:t:Mo

I close submissions in this issue.

funderburkjim commented 8 years ago

Re wil:vimbeHzWa,35577:vimbOzWa:t:eH Am adjusting to 'no change'

Here is the entry:

vimbeHzWa [p= 779] : .vimbeHzWa¦ mfn. (-zWaH-zWI-zWaM) Red-lipped, having lips like the Vimba fruit. E. vimba as above, and ozWa the lip; also vimbOzWa.

Since author mentions vimbOzWa as an alternate (occurs in SKD), we should leave unchanged.

However, not sure how vimbeH (abl. or gen. of vimbu) and ozWa (lip) can grammatically result in vimbeHzWa - Why is 'o' of ozWa dropped?

funderburkjim commented 8 years ago

Analysis finished.

drdhaval2785 commented 8 years ago

I disagree. OzWa and ozWa are alternate. ezWa can never occur in grammar.

bimba(vimba)+ozWa is the base word. वृद्धिरेचि causes बिम्बौष्ठ. ओत्वोष्ठयोः vArttika gives पररूप i.e. बिम्बोष्ठ.

funderburkjim commented 8 years ago

OK. I'll go with vimbOzWa.

Note I put a little message in the text in this case. @zaaf2 Has suggested we do this generally.

.विम्बौष्ठ¦ mfn. (-ष्ठः-ष्ठी-ष्ठं) (text shows विम्बेःष्ठ) Red-lipped, having lips like the Vimba fruit. E. विम्ब as above, and ओष्ठ the lip; also विम्बौष्ठ। [Page780]