\xa4 in ap90hw0.txt

[drdhaval2785]

While running the code, program stopped on some non-ASCII entry.

Line 10908: 0402-c:kiwwaM, --ki¤wwakaM:68656,68658
    Line 11045: 0407-c:ku¤wwa:69494,69496
    Line 11046: 0407-c:ku¤wwakaH:69497,69497
    Line 11047: 0407-c:ku¤wwanaM:69498,69499
    Line 11048: 0407-c:ku¤wwa(¤wwi)nI:69500,69501
    Line 11048: 0407-c:ku¤wwa(¤wwi)nI:69500,69501
    Line 11049: 0407-c:ku¤wwAka:69502,69505
    Line 11050: 0407-c:ku¤wwita:69506,69507
    Line 12041: 0441-c:Ka¤wwASaH --SI:75146,75146
    Line 12042: 0441-c:Ka¤wwiH:75147,75147
    Line 12043: 0441-c:Ka¤wwikaH:75148,75150
    Line 17500: 0652-a:Ga¤wwakuwIpraBAtanyAyaH:110029,110043
    Line 17630: 0659-b:pa¤wwakaH:111266,111268
    Line 17631: 0659-b:pa¤wwanaM --nI:111269,111269
    Line 17632: 0659-b:pa¤wwikA:111270,111276
    Line 21944: 0807-c:Ba¤wwAra:136135,136140
    Line 21947: 0807-c:Ba¤wwinI:136150,136154
    Line 31000: 1154-a:sPi¤ww:194340,194341

[funderburkjim]

1. Agree that these look like spurious characters within the original digitization. Based on examination of the scan for kuwwa, I see nothing that would warrant a special character between 'u' and 'w'. I'll generate corrections for these in ap90.txt.

Here is the digitzation for kuwwa, from ap90_orig_utf8.txt:

<P>.{#ku¤TTa#}¦ {%a.%} (At the end of comp.) Di-
<>viding, cutting; grinding. {#{@--¤TTaH@}#} (in
<>Math.) A multiplier.

Note the presence of that special character in the 2nd line also.

1. It may (or may not) be of interest or use to you to see the ap90hw1_note.txt file within pywork directory. Here is a sample of comments generated in the neighborhood of kuwwa: 0406-c: 'kujJawiH, kujJawikA, kujJawI' => 'kujJawiH' :69334,69335 0406-c: 'kuMjaH, --jaM' => 'kuMjaH' :69348,69358 0407-a: 'kuwika --ta' => 'kuwika' :69384,69384 0407-a: 'kuwaH, --waM' => 'kuwaH' :69385,69393 0407-b: 'kuwIraH, --raM, kuwIrakaH' => 'kuwIraH' :69448,69450 0407-b: 'kuwuMbaM, kuwuMbakaM' => 'kuwuMbaM' :69458,69473 0407-c: 'kuwuMbikaH, kuwuMbin' => 'kuwuMbikaH' :69474,69489 0407-c: 'ku¤wwa' => 'kuwwa' :69494,69496 0407-c: 'ku¤wwakaH' => 'kuwwakaH' :69497,69497 0407-c: 'ku¤wwanaM' => 'kuwwanaM' :69498,69499

[funderburkjim]

There are all in all 70 lines of the ap90.txt digitization where that ¤ character appears.

I looked at the scan for a couple of the others, and in those cases also that character appears to be a typo.

Thus, I think it is safe to consider all occurrences of that character to be typos, and will remove all of them from the digitization.

[gasyoun]

kuwwa, I see nothing that would warrant a special character between 'u' and 'w'. so do I. Thus, I think it is safe to consider all occurrences of that character to be typos, and will remove all of them from the digitization. seems fine, no meta data involved.

[funderburkjim]

corrections installed.