Closed drdhaval2785 closed 5 years ago
ACC:uTAnadvAdaSIvratakalpa:utTAnadvAdaSIvratakalpa:t
Not actually a correction submission, but a question for @funderburkjim Currently the headword is BaNgIBIra, Should it not be BaNgIBIradIkzita?
@zaaf2 may like to see the referred works and decide whether it is 'molha' or 'mohla'. Either of these two entries is wrong. See
and
ACC:OdIcryaprakASegotrapravaroccAraH:OdIcyaprakASegotrapravaroccAraH:t
crya -> cya
OdIcya is a name of gotra.
ACC:gaNgAnandakavondra:gaNgAnandakavIndra:t
kavIndra
ACC:gOtamIgaNgAmAhatmya:gOtamIgaNgAmAhAtmya:t
mAha -> mAhA
ACC:vESvatmyarahasya:vESvAtmyarahasya:t
vESva->vESvA
ACC:tkAvAda:ktvAvAda:t
Wrong orthography.
Looks like this.
Actually should look like this.
This completes ACC corrections based on MW as base.
I could not find these works. Perhaps मोल्ह and मोह्ल are just alternative forms. We find the same variation in other words. Examples from M-W:
सल्ह [p= 1190] : m. N. of a man (also written सह्ल) कल्हण [p= 263] : m. (also spelt कह्लण), N. of the author of the राज-तरंगिणी. बिह्लण [p= 732] : incorrect for बिल्हण. सह्ल [p= 1196] : सह्लण » सल्ह्° बाह्लीक [p= 729,3] n. = बाल्हिक
Maybe. Then let these two words survive, unless we get some more concrete data.
@funderburkjim all the series closable?
all the series closable?
I'm unsure if something is needed from me on this.
I'm unsure if something is needed from me on this.
The question remains if it has been implemented. There is no your comment here, which is strange and suspicious.
@drdhaval2785 so all are installable, but still not installed?
All are installed. The pending issues have been shifted to a placeholder.
Examining the newly generated faultfinder output at https://github.com/drdhaval2785/SanskritSpellCheck/blob/master/AllvsMW/dictwiseerrors3-table.html after a lot of corrections have already been done.
UPDATE Summarily these are the corrections. READY to be installed.
Two questions to be answered. https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/363#issuecomment-326789749 and https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/363#issuecomment-326790058