ACC vs MW corrections - Githubissues

sanskrit-lexicon / CORRECTIONS

Correction history for Cologne Sanskrit Lexicon

8 stars 5 forks source link

ACC vs MW corrections #363

Closed drdhaval2785 closed 5 years ago

drdhaval2785 commented 7 years ago

Examining the newly generated faultfinder output at https://github.com/drdhaval2785/SanskritSpellCheck/blob/master/AllvsMW/dictwiseerrors3-table.html after a lot of corrections have already been done.

UPDATE Summarily these are the corrections. READY to be installed.

ACC:uTAnadvAdaSIvratakalpa:utTAnadvAdaSIvratakalpa:t
ACC:OdIcryaprakASegotrapravaroccAraH:OdIcyaprakASegotrapravaroccAraH:t
ACC:gaNgAnandakavondra:gaNgAnandakavIndra:t
ACC:gOtamIgaNgAmAhatmya:gOtamIgaNgAmAhAtmya:t
ACC:vESvatmyarahasya:vESvAtmyarahasya:t
ACC:tkAvAda:ktvAvAda:t

Two questions to be answered. https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/363#issuecomment-326789749 and https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/CORRECTIONS/issues/363#issuecomment-326790058

drdhaval2785 commented 7 years ago

ACC:uTAnadvAdaSIvratakalpa:utTAnadvAdaSIvratakalpa:t

capture

drdhaval2785 commented 7 years ago

Not actually a correction submission, but a question for @funderburkjim Currently the headword is BaNgIBIra, Should it not be BaNgIBIradIkzita?

capture

drdhaval2785 commented 7 years ago

@zaaf2 may like to see the referred works and decide whether it is 'molha' or 'mohla'. Either of these two entries is wrong. See

capture

and

capture

drdhaval2785 commented 7 years ago

ACC:OdIcryaprakASegotrapravaroccAraH:OdIcyaprakASegotrapravaroccAraH:t

crya -> cya

OdIcya is a name of gotra.

capture

drdhaval2785 commented 7 years ago

ACC:gaNgAnandakavondra:gaNgAnandakavIndra:t

kavIndra

capture

drdhaval2785 commented 7 years ago

ACC:gOtamIgaNgAmAhatmya:gOtamIgaNgAmAhAtmya:t

mAha -> mAhA

capture

drdhaval2785 commented 7 years ago

ACC:vESvatmyarahasya:vESvAtmyarahasya:t

vESva->vESvA

capture

drdhaval2785 commented 7 years ago

ACC:tkAvAda:ktvAvAda:t

Wrong orthography.

Looks like this. capture

Actually should look like this. capture

drdhaval2785 commented 7 years ago

This completes ACC corrections based on MW as base.

zaaf2 commented 7 years ago

I could not find these works. Perhaps मोल्ह and मोह्ल are just alternative forms. We find the same variation in other words. Examples from M-W:

सल्ह [p= 1190] : m. N. of a man (also written सह्ल) कल्हण [p= 263] : m. (also spelt कह्लण), N. of the author of the राज-तरंगिणी. बिह्लण [p= 732] : incorrect for बिल्हण. सह्ल [p= 1196] : सह्लण » सल्ह्° बाह्लीक [p= 729,3] n. = बाल्हिक

drdhaval2785 commented 7 years ago

Maybe. Then let these two words survive, unless we get some more concrete data.

gasyoun commented 5 years ago

@funderburkjim all the series closable?

funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

all the series closable?

I'm unsure if something is needed from me on this.

gasyoun commented 5 years ago

I'm unsure if something is needed from me on this.

The question remains if it has been implemented. There is no your comment here, which is strange and suspicious.

gasyoun commented 5 years ago

@drdhaval2785 so all are installable, but still not installed?

drdhaval2785 commented 5 years ago

All are installed. The pending issues have been shifted to a placeholder.