Closed drdhaval2785 closed 6 years ago
@funderburkjim Now I will wait till all corrections till now are incorporated and sanhw1 is regenerated. Now I feel that the method has been exhausted for low hanging fruits. The work is tedious for comparision to other dictionaries and less fruitful.
Now I feel that the method has been exhausted for low hanging fruits.
1 to many comparisons over? Now many vs many left over, Dhaval?
I want to be sure I have all the corrections before starting.
Currently, I am aware of these sources:
@drdhaval2785 Do these four lists cover everything that needs to be installed?
Yes. These four lists have all the corrections. Confirmed.
SHS:pARokaraRa:pARIkaraRa:t
I think pAROkaraRa
(confirm MW, WIL)
SHS:
pARokaraRa¦
n. (-RaM) Marriage.
E. pARo with the hand, and karaRa making. [L=24278] [typo: also pARo -> pARO (loc. of pARi)
The corrections from the 4 lists are installed.
A few variations from the suggested solutions were made, and noted in comments appearing in this and related issues.
Here's an approximate summary of the changes, orgarnized by dictionary:
acc 13
ap 2
bop 4
bur 1
cae 6
ccs 7
gra 2
gst 5
inm 5
mci 2
mw72 13
pd 1
pe 2
pui 22
pw 14
pwg 12
sch 5
shs 18
skd 1
vei 2
wil 3
yat 5
vcp 2
Changing a headword spelling in one of the dictionaries converted to the meta-line format requires a change in two lines of the digitization X.txt:
For example, consider the correction of the ACC dictionary: ACC:Agamatatt:AgamatattvavilAsa:t
.
Here are the two change transactions for acc.txt.
; L=30136: Agamatatt -> AgamatattvavilAsa # typo #
; ------ FIRST change: to meta-line ------
134093 old <L>30136<pc>1-773,2<k1>Agamatatt<k2>Agamatatt{??}
134093 new <L>30136<pc>1-773,2<k1>AgamatattvavilAsa<k2>AgamatattvavilAsa
; ------ SECOND change: to next line of acc.txt -----------
134094 old {#Agamatatt{??}#}¦ {??} tantr. by Raghunātha Tarkavāgīśa.
134094 new {#AgamatattvavilAsa#}¦ {??} tantr. by Raghunātha Tarkavāgīśa.
This situation was handled by changing the transaction generation program, so it would generate the two transactions when a dictionary was recognized as in meta-line format.
A third factor is when the error is in the separate list of alternate headwords for a dictionary.
For instance, in VCP, one correction is VCP:ttri:attri:p
.
Here, there was no change required in the digitization vcp.txt, but rather the error was in vcp_hwextra.txt, for this alternate spelling of headword 'atri'
old:
<L>1091.1<k1>ttri<k2>ttri<type>alt<LP>1091<k1P>atri
new:
<L>1091.1<k1>attri<k2>attri<type>alt<LP>1091<k1P>atri
I think this and the several related issues can be closed now, but will leave the honors to @drdhaval2785 .
395 to #408