sanskrit-lexicon / CORRECTIONS

Correction history for Cologne Sanskrit Lexicon
8 stars 5 forks source link

PWG corrections, from faultfinder list #49

Closed funderburkjim closed 9 years ago

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

This issue is devoted corrections to headwords from the PWG dictionary.

The starting list contains 90 headwords, and was obtained from AllvsMW.txt in SanskritSpellCheck as all lines matching the regular expression:

:PWG$

Also, the words don't contain 'rxx' - form as their reason for being in the AllvsMW.txt list. Since the list is short, no further reductions were deemed necessary (there are a few duplicates)

After listing headword corrections, a list of the remaining headwords (those not requiring correction) from this list will be shown.

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

1 aNolaka -> aNkolaka

image

2 kOSori -> kESori image

3 dUrOpabdas -> dUraupabdas hiatus image

4 bfCacCAtAtapa -> bfhacCAtAtapa image

5 roDrazuzpiRI -> roDrapuzpiRI image

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

6 sulERaka -> sulaiRaka hiatus image

7 appEdIkzita -> appaidIkzita hiatus image

8 AKowSIrzaka -> AKowaSIrzaka image

9 AvaBfTya -> AvaBftya ADDENDUM: Not an error. See Dhaval's comment below. image

10 uYcEstamAm -> uccEstamAm print error image

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

11 ftpeya -> ftapeya image

12 ekAdBacatvAriMSat -> ekA?acatvAriMSat ? preceding word is ekAdeSa, following word is ekAnaMSA addendum: ekAdnacatvAriMSat (see comment by gasyoun below)

image

13 kapiSIzRI -> kapiSIrzRI image

14 GaRtodara -> GaRwodara image

15 GoYculikA -> GeYculikA image

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

16 caturUDnA -> caturUDnA ADDENDUM: This is not an error. image

17 jalaDaragarjitaGozasusvaranakzatrarAjasaMkusumritABijYa -> jalaDaragarjitaGozasusvaranakzatrarAjasaMkusumitABijYa

At end of word, kusumritA -> kusumitA
print error image

18 duppariRAma -> duzpariRAma image

19 dfztipanTan -> dfzwipanTan image

20 dozkulya -> dOzkulya image

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

21 Baraqka -> Baraqaka image

22 BramarAmvAkzetra -> BramarAmbAkzetra unclear print image

23 maDuvrAhmaRa -> maDubrAhmaRa image

24 mahASERqI -> mahASORqI image

25 mumkaSUnya -> muzkaSUnya print error image

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

26 suduztara -> sudustara image

27 sODrikamaya -> sEDrikamaya image

28 strIrDamiRI -> strIDarmiRI print error image

29 amarakaRwka -> amarakaRwaka image

30 AgNga -> ANga (2nd homonym) image

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

31 ekalvya -> ekalavya image

32 OtkaRQya -> OtkaRWya ? ADDENDUM: Confirmed by Dhaval in comment below. By inference, this is a print error. The reasoning: The definition reference utkaRQa, but only utkaRWa is a headword in PWG. Thus, he must have meant 'W' in this word. image

33 nirutrsava -> nirutsava print smudge image

34 parizvajYjana -> parizvaYjana image

35 pravandDar -> prabandDar = mw prabandDf image

gasyoun commented 9 years ago

12 ekādbhacatvāriṃśat -> ekādnacatvāriṃśat

drdhaval2785 commented 9 years ago
9 AvaBfTya -> AvaBftya 

These are two separate headwords. capture

See the digitized version:

capture

drdhaval2785 commented 9 years ago

12 ekAdBacatvAriMSat -> ekA?acatvAriMSat ? ekAdnacatvAriMSat. 'dn' Marcis is right.

Also see ekAdnaviMSati:VCP

drdhaval2785 commented 9 years ago

22 BramarAmvAkzetra -> BramarAmbAkzetra Correct.

drdhaval2785 commented 9 years ago
32 OtkaRQya -> OtkaRWya ?
By inference, this is a print error. The reasoning:
The definition reference utkaRQa, but only
utkaRWa is a headword in PWG. Thus, he must have meant 'W' in this word.

OtkaRWya is the correct word. W.

drdhaval2785 commented 9 years ago

Rest are fine.

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

Incorporated changes/comments by @gasyoun and @drdhaval2785 up through 35. Thanks.

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

36 mAtsna -> mArtsna print error image

37 yugapIrSvaga -> yugapArSvaga print smudge image

38 vadBrI -> vadDrI difficult Devanagari conjunct image

38a viviwwyE ok ? @drdhaval2785 confirms it is ok (see his comment below) image

38b viSiSnya ok? @drdhaval2785 confirms it is ok (see his comment below) image

39 vyAvarntana -> vyAvartana image

40 samayodDyota -> samayoddyota image

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

41 suniztriMSa -> sunistriMSa image

42 srazwwatva -> srazwftva image

43 hastpa -> hastya image

44 kti -> ukti image [ etc]

45 ksvelya -> kzvelya image

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

46 kacC -> kacCa image [etc] 47 havizws -> havizwas image

This completes error identification for this list.

gasyoun commented 9 years ago

I hope PWK and SCH are close. Hail to Jim! He's now versed in the French ligatures :accept:

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

Here is the remainder, that I think are are correct:

ok#01 AjUma ok#02 gobAlin = mw govAla ok#03 nfBojas ok#04 pANi zu streichen ok#05 mazurARa ok#06 SOcodaka ok#07 somAmbupO m. dual ok#08 arhayoSri ok#09 AzkAraniDana ok#10 iNkuma ok#11 izviSvajyotis ok#12 uccIkar ok#13 EDmavAha ok#14 EDmahAra ok#15 karaYjeSvaratIrTa ok#16 kiqma ok#17 kimmUrI ok#18 kENkalAyana = MW kEMkalAyana ok#19 cIrIlli ok#20 pANNI ok#21 praSayyuvAka = MW praSaMyuvAka ok#22 vidmisAra fehlerhaft fur bimbisAra ok#23 vfkyA ok#24 zaqloha ok#25 harimIqestotra ok#26 hUNgarAI ok#27 hemmatisiMha ok#28 ukTyAmahIyava ok#29 ozwrA ok#30 OkzRoniyAna Addendum: corrected to OkzRonuyAna per @drdhaval2785 comment below ok#31 OkzRoranDra ok#32 caNkrAyaRa wohl fehlerhaft für ok#33 nEzRya ok#34 pAScAttyAkarasaMBava = mw pAScAtyAkarasaMBava ok#35 viviwwyE ok#36 viSiSnya ok#37 SOcivfkzyA ok#38 sakTya ok#39 sApatnyeya ok#40 parq = mw pfq ok#41 lacC = mw laC ok#42 havizws dup ok#43 AvaBfTya (see 9 above)

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

Re: 'Jim is now versed in French ligatures'

As M. Jourdain was delighted to learn he had been speaking prose, I am delighted to learn of this new skill I now possess.

BTW: Is there some compendium (with IAST counterparts) of French ligatures for Devanagari?

gasyoun commented 9 years ago

Burnouf has the biggest list of Schlegel's ligatures (http://www.sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de/scans/csldoc/dictionaries/prefaces/burpref/burpref06.html and http://www.sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de/scans/csldoc/dictionaries/prefaces/burpref/burpref07.html). My article in Russian with unknown before photos and scans from Paris like the ones bellow is to be published in 2015. If the RAS survives. In red - my reconstruction of the font from 2005.

sanscrit 20pts 1

sanscrit 20pts 1

schlegel-varnamala-a4

drdhaval2785 commented 9 years ago
38a viviwwyE ok ?

It seems a correct word. I saw its occurence in http://prramamurthy1931.blogspot.in/2013/07/mahanarayanopanishad-virjahoma-mantraah.html. विविट्ट्यै स्वाहा ।
Also the alternate possible विविष्ट्यै is not fitting in the order.

drdhaval2785 commented 9 years ago
38b viSiSnya ok?

Seems OK. No alternate word anywhere near. The explanation is also congruent with the word.

drdhaval2785 commented 9 years ago

Rest till 47 are OK.

drdhaval2785 commented 9 years ago

In OK list-

ok#30 OkzRoniyAna:PWG

This has to be OkzRonuyAna PW has that with same meaning

OkzRoniyAna:PWG OkzRonuyAna:PW

drdhaval2785 commented 9 years ago
ok#40 parq = mw pfq

The headword is OK. Incidentally description has error pfj insted of pfq

capture

drdhaval2785 commented 9 years ago
ok#42 havizws dup

I guess you wanted to mention that it has already been converted to havizwas ago - right ?

Rest all are fine OK words.

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

regarding ok#42 havizws dup -

Yes, this word is corrected above at 47 havizws -> havizwas. Its mention in the ok list is just that it is a duplicate (appeared twice) in the list I started with.

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

48 OkzRoniyAna -> OkzRonuyAna See @drdhaval2785 comment above. By classifying as error, we are saying 'ni' is a print error.

image

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

Re the 'Sanscrit 20 points scans above:

That is a nice resource. It is clearer than the images from Burnouf. Perhaps it should not remain only as an image in this issue.

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

Re 16 caturUDnA -> caturUDnA This was erroneously classified as an error. It is ok.

funderburkjim commented 9 years ago

Corrections have been installed. Closing issue.