Closed Andhrabharati closed 8 months ago
Reason being, MW has took the citations "as is" from the PW set (PWG and pwk), at almost all the places.
MW has took the citations "as is" from the PW set (PWG and pwk), at almost all the places.
Yet another proof for a copycat. @funderburkjim agree!
@funderburkjim
Would you glance this once, and take action please?
MW links to R. i, xx, yy & R. ii, xx, yy should also be linked to the Schlegel ed. (as in PWG).
Request noted.
See the above commits for the change.
mw links to Kanda i (example amara as above) Schlegel edition mw links to Kanda ii (example anuraTyA) Schlegel edition mw links to other Kandas (example apASraya) Gorresio edition
@funderburkjim
Just by chance, seen the
R. i, 34, 16
link at the entry "amara" and noted that it is linked to the Gorresio ed. which does not contain the referred word "amarī" at all!Then checked with PWG and seen that it is linked to the Schlegel ed., which does contain the word "amarī".
I guess, MW links to
R. i, xx, yy
&R. ii, xx, yy
should also be linked to the Schlegel ed. (as in PWG).