Gram. 54 Link to Whitney Sanskrit Grammar

[gasyoun]

@funderburkjim if there would be a one working sample, I could make a list of links to Whitney

[Andhrabharati]

@gasyoun These Grammar citations are from MW's Grammar book, not Whitney's (unless specifically mentioned thus), as I had pointed out recently at another issue (#44), reg. Gr.; the same applies to Gram. as well.

@funderburkjim I see that the tooltip is still showing Whitney at this 'ka' entry; I recall that you had changed the Gr. tooltip; the Gram. tooltip also needs a similar change.

[There are total 10 Gram. citations in MW.]

[Andhrabharati]

BTW, the 'a' after 836 is Roman letter, not Devanagari, here in mw.txt-- <ls>Gram. 836</ls>. <s>a</s> -> <ls>Gram. 836,a.</ls>

[gasyoun]

These Grammar citations are from MW's Grammar book, not Whitney

That was my first thought as well. @Andhrabharati thanks for noting it once again.

[funderburkjim]

the 'a' after 836 is Roman letter

Corrected.

The 'a' appears as 'A' in display due to the charterindocapital font used for text within <ls>Text</ls>.

[funderburkjim]

'Gram.' ls tooltip abbreviation changed to A Practical Grammar of the Sanskrit Language, Monier-Willilams

[funderburkjim]

@gasyoun

File extract.txt has all the (19) instances of <ls>X</ls> where X starts with "Gr." or "Gram.".

Apparently, there is some ambiguity as to whether a given instance of 'Gr.' actually refers to MW's grammar or Whitney's grammar, and similarly for Gram.

You can examine these instances and appropriately replace the question mark with either 'mw' or 'whitney'. For example, based on AB's investigation above under ; <L>41336.1<pc>240,3<k1>ka you would replace

; <L>41336.1<pc>240,3<k1>ka
Gram. 836. a ::: ?

with

Gram. 836. a ::: mw

since Gram. here refers to Monier-Williams Grammar.

Then upload the revised extract.txt file.

You might also note the anomalies where

• 'Gram.' is used but actually the reference is to Whitney grammar
• 'Gr.' is used, but actually the reference is to MW grammar.

@gasyoun Please confirm.

[Andhrabharati]

@gasyoun

@funderburkjim's waiting time is nearing 6 months shortly (in another week's time), for this simple task.

[funderburkjim]

I think the above commit finishes what remained to be done.