Closed funderburkjim closed 5 months ago
The conclusion I draw is that MW fabricated 'suzupsa'. Since there are no applicabe cdsl conventions, I propose:
e.g.
old:
<s>suzupsa</s> ¦ <lex>mfn.</lex> desirous of sleeping, sleepy,
<ls>Suśr.</ls>; <ls>Śiś.</ls>; <ls>BhP.</ls><info lex="m:f:n"/>
new:
<s>suzupsa</s> ¦ [SIC <s>suzupsu</s>] <lex>mfn.</lex> desirous of sleeping, sleepy,
<ls>Suśr.</ls>; <ls>Śiś.</ls>; <ls>BhP.</ls><info lex="m:f:n"/>
HELP WANTED!
HELP WANTED!
This does not need so much of "extra thinking". It is just a plain print error in MW.
I see no reason, why MW needed to 'fabricate' any entry!!
It is well known (mentioned by MW himself) that ~2/3rds of MW content is from MW72 [mostly as is, or slightly revised at times] (which is almost taken from PWG), and most of the remaining content is from pwk.
Here is what MW72 has (1162,1)--
and compare with what MW has--
(1280,2)
and (1238,1)
Though I can give all the "actual" citations from PWG (as I have all the sources), one given by Jim (even though its not the 'source' used by PWG) is sufficient enough for now.
~2/3rds of MW content is from MW72 [mostly as is, or slightly revised at times] (which is almost taken from PWG), and most of the remaining content is from pwk.
@Andhrabharati sharp analysis, as usual
corrected to:
<L>250321<pc>1238,1<k1>suzupsu<k2>suzupsu<e>2
<s>suzupsu</s> ¦ <lex>mfn.</lex> desirous of sleeping, sleepy,
<ls>Suśr.</ls>; <ls>Śiś.</ls>; <ls>BhP.</ls><info lex="m:f:n"/>
User @aumsanskrit reported (by email) a probable error in mw under सुषुप्स. I think this should be marked somehow as an error, but I'm not sure how to so mark it.
Using slp1 spelling. There are 3 related headwords in MW:
I found the Śiś. 12, 52. (SiSupAlavaDa) reference: https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.654/page/n439/mode/2up
The usage is suzupsunA, (instrumental singular of suzupsu).