Open funderburkjim opened 5 years ago
The feminine stem is generated by adding a long 'I' to the citation form, but with one additional twist. For example, feminine stem for 'gAmin' is 'gAminI'.
The twist involves the need to apply nR sandhi. For instance, feminine stem of 'kArin' starts as 'kArinI', but then nR sandhi application changes this to 'kAriRI'.
As in the declension algorithms, here also we use the pada structure to determine the impact of nR
sandhi.
For instance, the feminine of agra-gAmin is taken to be agra-gAminI, since the 'r' in 'agra' is not in the final pada, and hence does not play a role.
Since the pada-structure is determined indirectly from the MW markup, there can be the possibility that a different pada structure is appropriate for our declension purposes. As example,
'akzamin' . From lexnorm-all2, this is 'a-kza-min'; and from this the feminine would be 'akzaminI', since
the 'z' is not in last pada.
But this 'a-kza-min' pada structure should be 'a-kzamin' (kzamin = patient, a-kzamin = not patient). And with this pada structure, the feminine stem is 'a-kzamiRI'.
To examine possible additional cases like a-kza-min, where we need to change pada structure in lexnorm-all2 to correctly determine the feminine stem, I made a list of potential questionable feminine stems for nominals endin in 'in'.
There are only 114 cases listed. These are cases where
I hope @SergeA and/or @drdhaval2785 will take a look at this list with an eye towards finding cases like 'a-kza-min'.
I'm particularly suspicious of the cases where we have the 'in' form of a prefixed verb. For instance 'nir-vahin', 'pari-kampin', etc.
When we get more inputs on these, I'll change the pada structure in lexnorm-all2 cases for a-kza-min and similar cases.
Once the feminine stem is generated, it is declined just like other common nominals ending in 'I', like nadI
. So we could say the model is 'f_I', like it is for nadI. I have used 'f_in_I' just for the purpose of being able to readily identify that the feminine stem comes from a nominal ending in 'in'. So f_in_I is merely an alias for f_I, as far as the declension algorithm is concerned.
Antoine and Deshpande consider the declension of nominals ending in 'in' to fall in the category of 'nouns with two stems'. The explanation of Kale is similar, although he does not use the 'two stem' terminology. This two-stem theory is used in order to derive the inflected forms from a fairly general set of endings, along with a method of deriving a 'strong' and 'weak' stem, and an indication of which endings should be combined with the strong and weak stems.
By contrast, the algorithm used here uses only one stem (obtained by dropping the final 'in' from the citation form), and embeds the variations in the table of endings. This seems similar in spirit to Bucknell's approach, which favors paradigm tables.
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | I | inO | inaH |
Accusative | inam | inO | inaH |
Instrumental | inA | iByAm | iBiH |
Dative | ine | iByAm | iByaH |
Ablative | inaH | iByAm | iByaH |
Genitive | inaH | inoH | inAm |
Locative | ini | inoH | izu |
Vocative | in | inO | inaH |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | i | inI | Ini |
Accusative | i | inI | Ini |
Instrumental | inA | iByAm | iBiH |
Dative | ine | iByAm | iByaH |
Ablative | inaH | iByAm | iByaH |
Genitive | inaH | inoH | inAm |
Locative | ini | inoH | izu |
Vocative | i/in | inI | Ini |
These endings are the same as masculine in cases 3-7.
Obtain the base by dropping the final 'in'.
Completely analogous to vowel-ending declension algorithms. In brief:
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | bal + I = balI | bal + inO = balinO | bal + inaH = balinaH |
Accusative | bal + inam = balinam | bal + inO = balinO | bal + inaH = balinaH |
Instrumental | bal + inA = balinA | bal + iByAm = baliByAm | bal + iBiH = baliBiH |
Dative | bal + ine = baline | bal + iByAm = baliByAm | bal + iByaH = baliByaH |
Ablative | bal + inaH = balinaH | bal + iByAm = baliByAm | bal + iByaH = baliByaH |
Genitive | bal + inaH = balinaH | bal + inoH = balinoH | bal + inAm = balinAm |
Locative | bal + ini = balini | bal + inoH = balinoH | bal + izu = balizu |
Vocative | bal + in = balin | bal + inO = balinO | bal + inaH = balinaH |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | cAr + i = cAri | cAr + inI = cArinI -> cAriRI | cAr + Ini = cArIni -> cArIRi |
Accusative | cAr + i = cAri | cAr + inI = cArinI -> cAriRI | cAr + Ini = cArIni -> cArIRi |
Instrumental | cAr + inA = cArinA -> cAriRA | cAr + iByAm = cAriByAm | cAr + iBiH = cAriBiH |
Dative | cAr + ine = cArine -> cAriRe | cAr + iByAm = cAriByAm | cAr + iByaH = cAriByaH |
Ablative | cAr + inaH = cArinaH -> cAriRaH | cAr + iByAm = cAriByAm | cAr + iByaH = cAriByaH |
Genitive | cAr + inaH = cArinaH -> cAriRaH | cAr + inoH = cArinoH -> cAriRoH | cAr + inAm = cArinAm -> cAriRAm |
Locative | cAr + ini = cArini -> cAriRi | cAr + inoH = cArinoH -> cAriRoH | cAr + izu = cArizu |
Vocative | cAr + i/in = cAri/cArin | cAr + inI = cArinI -> cAriRI | cAr + Ini = cArIni -> cArIRi |
There are 6722 nominal citations in lexnorm-all2 which end in 'in'.
The stem generation results in models m_in, n_in, and f_in_I.
See next comment for discussion of f_in_I.