Open funderburkjim opened 5 years ago
Recall the general endings for the 1-stem models.
The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.
For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | gup | gupO | gupaH |
Accusative | gupam | gupO | gupaH |
Instrumental | gupA | gubByAm | gubBiH |
Dative | gupe | gubByAm | gubByaH |
Ablative | gupaH | gubByAm | gubByaH |
Genitive | gupaH | gupoH | gupAm |
Locative | gupi | gupoH | gupsu |
Vocative | gup | gupO | gupaH |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | gup | gupI | gumpi |
Accusative | gup | gupI | gumpi |
Instrumental | gupA | gubByAm | gubBiH |
Dative | gupe | gubByAm | gubByaH |
Ablative | gupaH | gubByAm | gubByaH |
Genitive | gupaH | gupoH | gupAm |
Locative | gupi | gupoH | gupsu |
Vocative | gup | gupI | gumpi |
Note: I've found no printed instances of gumpi, so regard this as speculative.
The notable instance is ap (f. 'water'), which possibly should have only plural forms and which has other irregularities.
The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.
For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | klip | klibO | klibaH |
Accusative | klibam | klibO | klibaH |
Instrumental | klibA | klibByAm | klibBiH |
Dative | klibe | klibByAm | klibByaH |
Ablative | klibaH | klibByAm | klibByaH |
Genitive | klibaH | kliboH | klibAm |
Locative | klibi | kliboH | klipsu |
Vocative | klip | klibO | klibaH |
This is theoretical, as there are in MW no neuter nominals ending in b.
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | klip | klibI | klimbi |
Accusative | klip | klibI | klimbi |
Instrumental | klibA | klibByAm | klibBiH |
Dative | klibe | klibByAm | klibByaH |
Ablative | klibaH | klibByAm | klibByaH |
Genitive | klibaH | kliboH | klibAm |
Locative | klibi | kliboH | klipsu |
Vocative | klip | klibI | klimbi |
The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.
For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | Sup | SuBO | SuBaH |
Accusative | SuBam | SuBO | SuBaH |
Instrumental | SuBA | SubByAm | SubBiH |
Dative | SuBe | SubByAm | SubByaH |
Ablative | SuBaH | SubByAm | SubByaH |
Genitive | SuBaH | SuBoH | SuBAm |
Locative | SuBi | SuBoH | Supsu |
Vocative | Sup | SuBO | SuBaH |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | stup | stuBI | stumBi |
Accusative | stup | stuBI | stumBi |
Instrumental | stuBA | stubByAm | stubBiH |
Dative | stuBe | stubByAm | stubByaH |
Ablative | stuBaH | stubByAm | stubByaH |
Genitive | stuBaH | stuBoH | stuBAm |
Locative | stuBi | stuBoH | stupsu |
Vocative | stup | stuBI | stumBi |
MW has following:
gardabh mfn. (fr. °bhaya; nom. °rdhab), Pāṇ. 8-2, 32 ; Pat.
By our current algorithm, the nom. singular would be gardap, rather than garDab of MW.
In the declension of buD, we changed the initial b to B in the forms where the final D of buD loses its aspiration.
Should the initial g in gfB be similarly changed to G in the forms where the final B of gfB loses its aspiration?
Is there a single (understandable) sandhi rule that is playing a role in all these examples (gardaB, buD, gfB) ?
Here is Kale's Section 96 comment, which may be the sandhi rule functioning in the above cases.
When a mono-syllabic root (or root-noun) begins with b, g, or d and ends with G, Q, D, B, or h, the b, g, or d is respectively changed to B, G, or D before s or Dv or when followed by nothing or when the final soft aspirate is changed to an unaspirate letter. [Pan 8.2.37]
The last clause (when the final soft aspirate is changed to an unaspirate letter
would apply to our examples with buD and gfB. Is this right, @SergeA or @drdhaval2785 ?
The reasoning for gardaB probably flows from Pan 8.2.32 which MW references; but I don't understand Katre's explanation well enough to apply it to all the declined forms of gardaB, or to understand how to identify other inflectional forms to which it might apply.
See Kale section 107, p. 66.
... They have no other peculiarity than this, that they change their m to n before consonantal terminations.
Based on Kale's example declension of praSAm, we can restate this in terms of our rules as:
The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.
For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | praSAn | praSAmO | praSAmaH |
Accusative | praSAmam | praSAmO | praSAmaH |
Instrumental | praSAmA | praSAnByAm | praSAnBiH |
Dative | praSAme | praSAnByAm | praSAnByaH |
Ablative | praSAmaH | praSAnByAm | praSAnByaH |
Genitive | praSAmaH | praSAmoH | praSAmAm |
Locative | praSAmi | praSAmoH | praSAnsu |
Vocative | praSAn | praSAmO | praSAmaH |
Case | S | D | P |
---|---|---|---|
Nominative | praSAn | praSAmI | praSAmi |
Accusative | praSAn | praSAmI | praSAmi |
Instrumental | praSAmA | praSAnByAm | praSAnBiH |
Dative | praSAme | praSAnByAm | praSAnByaH |
Ablative | praSAmaH | praSAnByAm | praSAnByaH |
Genitive | praSAmaH | praSAmoH | praSAmAm |
Locative | praSAmi | praSAmoH | praSAnsu |
Vocative | praSAn | praSAmI | praSAmi |
Note: the 1s, 2s, and 8s of neuter is shown ending in n. This is consistent with Kale's statement above, in that the normal stem endings for 1s and 2s in the neuter is 'm', a consonant. However, in the printed text Kale shows the ending m for these 1s, 2s, 8s forms: praSAm. Is this praSAm a typo in the printed text of Kale, or is the form praSAn correct for these forms?
Note: I've found no printed instances of gumpi, so regard this as speculative.
Searched in GRETIL and googled in devanagari?
The notable instance is ap (f. 'water'), which possibly should have only plural forms
plural only, right
Is there a single (understandable) sandhi rule that is playing a role in all these examples (gardaB, buD, gfB) ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grassmann%27s_law
There is a book, translation of wich I plan to publish in 2019, it's called SANSKRIT SANDHI AND EXERCISES. https://yadi.sk/i/H2QzxBPwokmu3 and the mixed text (with Russian, but in .doc, not .pdf) https://yadi.sk/i/H2QzxBPwokmu3
30. t, th are replaced by the voiced aspirated dental stop after any voiced aspirated stop (W160). E.g., budh- ‘be awakened’ + ta- ⇒ bud-dha- ‘awakened’ (see 33); labh- ‘receive’ + tṛ ‘agent’ ⇒ labdhṛ- ‘re-ceiver.’ But, the rule does not apply to the present stem dadh- from dhā- ‘place’ (W667-8) and to its desiderative.
Kale seems really hard to use as compared to Bucknell - more questions arise, than are solved.
For a general discussion of declension of the nominals ending in consonants and declined with the '1-stem' models, see #41.
From analyze_1cons.txt we extract the following frequency information for nominals ending in a labial and declined with the '1-stem' models.