sanskrit-lexicon / MWinflect

Generate declensions and conjugations based upon words in MW1899 dictionary.
1 stars 0 forks source link

Nominals of 1 stem ending in labial consonant #44

Open funderburkjim opened 5 years ago

funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

For a general discussion of declension of the nominals ending in consonants and declined with the '1-stem' models, see #41.

From analyze_1cons.txt we extract the following frequency information for nominals ending in a labial and declined with the '1-stem' models.

funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

The case of final consonant p

Recall the general endings for the 1-stem models.

The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.

For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also

Declension of m_1_p gup

Case S D P
Nominative gup gupO gupaH
Accusative gupam gupO gupaH
Instrumental gupA gubByAm gubBiH
Dative gupe gubByAm gubByaH
Ablative gupaH gubByAm gubByaH
Genitive gupaH gupoH gupAm
Locative gupi gupoH gupsu
Vocative gup gupO gupaH

Declension of n_1_p gup

Case S D P
Nominative gup gupI gumpi
Accusative gup gupI gumpi
Instrumental gupA gubByAm gubBiH
Dative gupe gubByAm gubByaH
Ablative gupaH gubByAm gubByaH
Genitive gupaH gupoH gupAm
Locative gupi gupoH gupsu
Vocative gup gupI gumpi

Note: I've found no printed instances of gumpi, so regard this as speculative.

irregular forms not yet handled

The notable instance is ap (f. 'water'), which possibly should have only plural forms and which has other irregularities.

funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

The case of final consonant b

The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.

For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also

Declension of f_1_b klib

Case S D P
Nominative klip klibO klibaH
Accusative klibam klibO klibaH
Instrumental klibA klibByAm klibBiH
Dative klibe klibByAm klibByaH
Ablative klibaH klibByAm klibByaH
Genitive klibaH kliboH klibAm
Locative klibi kliboH klipsu
Vocative klip klibO klibaH

Declension of n_1_b klib

This is theoretical, as there are in MW no neuter nominals ending in b.

Case S D P
Nominative klip klibI klimbi
Accusative klip klibI klimbi
Instrumental klibA klibByAm klibBiH
Dative klibe klibByAm klibByaH
Ablative klibaH klibByAm klibByaH
Genitive klibaH kliboH klibAm
Locative klibi kliboH klipsu
Vocative klip klibI klimbi
funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

The case of final consonant B

The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.

For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also

Declension of f_1_B SuB

Case S D P
Nominative Sup SuBO SuBaH
Accusative SuBam SuBO SuBaH
Instrumental SuBA SubByAm SubBiH
Dative SuBe SubByAm SubByaH
Ablative SuBaH SubByAm SubByaH
Genitive SuBaH SuBoH SuBAm
Locative SuBi SuBoH Supsu
Vocative Sup SuBO SuBaH

Declension of n_1_B stuB

Case S D P
Nominative stup stuBI stumBi
Accusative stup stuBI stumBi
Instrumental stuBA stubByAm stubBiH
Dative stuBe stubByAm stubByaH
Ablative stuBaH stubByAm stubByaH
Genitive stuBaH stuBoH stuBAm
Locative stuBi stuBoH stupsu
Vocative stup stuBI stumBi
funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

question regarding moving aspiration

First example: gardaB

MW has following:

gardabh mfn. (fr. °bhaya; nom. °rdhab), Pāṇ. 8-2, 32 ; Pat.

By our current algorithm, the nom. singular would be gardap, rather than garDab of MW.

Second example: gfB

In the declension of buD, we changed the initial b to B in the forms where the final D of buD loses its aspiration.

Should the initial g in gfB be similarly changed to G in the forms where the final B of gfB loses its aspiration?

Is there a single (understandable) sandhi rule that is playing a role in all these examples (gardaB, buD, gfB) ?

funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

Addendum to prior questions

Here is Kale's Section 96 comment, which may be the sandhi rule functioning in the above cases.

When a mono-syllabic root (or root-noun) begins with b, g, or d and ends with G, Q, D, B, or h, the b, g, or d is respectively changed to B, G, or D before s or Dv or when followed by nothing or when the final soft aspirate is changed to an unaspirate letter. [Pan 8.2.37]

The last clause (when the final soft aspirate is changed to an unaspirate letter would apply to our examples with buD and gfB. Is this right, @SergeA or @drdhaval2785 ?

The reasoning for gardaB probably flows from Pan 8.2.32 which MW references; but I don't understand Katre's explanation well enough to apply it to all the declined forms of gardaB, or to understand how to identify other inflectional forms to which it might apply.

funderburkjim commented 5 years ago

The case of final consonant m

See Kale section 107, p. 66.

... They have no other peculiarity than this, that they change their m to n before consonantal terminations.

Based on Kale's example declension of praSAm, we can restate this in terms of our rules as:

The masculine and feminine declensions are the same.

For neuter declension, same rules as above, but also

Declension of m_1_m praSAm

Case S D P
Nominative praSAn praSAmO praSAmaH
Accusative praSAmam praSAmO praSAmaH
Instrumental praSAmA praSAnByAm praSAnBiH
Dative praSAme praSAnByAm praSAnByaH
Ablative praSAmaH praSAnByAm praSAnByaH
Genitive praSAmaH praSAmoH praSAmAm
Locative praSAmi praSAmoH praSAnsu
Vocative praSAn praSAmO praSAmaH

Declension of n_1_m praSAm

Case S D P
Nominative praSAn praSAmI praSAmi
Accusative praSAn praSAmI praSAmi
Instrumental praSAmA praSAnByAm praSAnBiH
Dative praSAme praSAnByAm praSAnByaH
Ablative praSAmaH praSAnByAm praSAnByaH
Genitive praSAmaH praSAmoH praSAmAm
Locative praSAmi praSAmoH praSAnsu
Vocative praSAn praSAmI praSAmi

Note: the 1s, 2s, and 8s of neuter is shown ending in n. This is consistent with Kale's statement above, in that the normal stem endings for 1s and 2s in the neuter is 'm', a consonant. However, in the printed text Kale shows the ending m for these 1s, 2s, 8s forms: praSAm. Is this praSAm a typo in the printed text of Kale, or is the form praSAn correct for these forms?

gasyoun commented 5 years ago

Note: I've found no printed instances of gumpi, so regard this as speculative.

Searched in GRETIL and googled in devanagari?

The notable instance is ap (f. 'water'), which possibly should have only plural forms

plural only, right

Is there a single (understandable) sandhi rule that is playing a role in all these examples (gardaB, buD, gfB) ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grassmann%27s_law

There is a book, translation of wich I plan to publish in 2019, it's called SANSKRIT SANDHI AND EXERCISES. https://yadi.sk/i/H2QzxBPwokmu3 and the mixed text (with Russian, but in .doc, not .pdf) https://yadi.sk/i/H2QzxBPwokmu3

30. t, th are replaced by the voiced aspirated dental stop after any voiced aspirated stop (W160). E.g., budh- ‘be awakened’ + ta- ⇒ bud-dha- ‘awakened’ (see 33); labh- ‘receive’ + tṛ ‘agent’ ⇒ labdhṛ- ‘re-ceiver.’ But, the rule does not apply to the present stem dadh- from dhā- ‘place’ (W667-8) and to its desiderative.

Kale seems really hard to use as compared to Bucknell - more questions arise, than are solved.